Signal deformation fault monitors for dual-frequency GBAS

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   ICAO Annex 10 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, Vol. 1, Amendments 90; 2006.
2. 2.↵
   ICAO Annex 10 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, Vol. 1, Amendments 91; 2018.
3. 3.↵
   1. ICAO SARPs

   . GBAS CAT II/III development baseline SARPs and conceptual framework for the proposal for GBAS to support CAT III operations. NSP WGW November 2009 Report. https://www.icao.int/safety/airnavigation/documents/gnss_cat_ii_iii.pdf.
4. 4.↵
   1. Shloss P,
   2. Phelts RE,
   3. Walter T,
   4. Enge P

   . A simple method of signal quality monitoring for WAAS LNAV/VNAV. Proceedings of the 15th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GPS 2002). Portland, OR; September 2002, pp. 800–808.
5. 5.↵
   1. Brenner M,
   2. Liu F

   . Ranging source fault detection performance for category III GBAS. 23rd International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation. Portland, OR; September 21-24, 2010, pp. 2618–2632.
6. 6.↵
   1. Daly P,
   2. Riley S,
   3. Raby P

   . Recent advances in the implementation of GNSS. Proceedings of the 6th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GPS 1993). Salt Lake City, UT; September 1993, pp. 433–440.
7. 7.↵
   1. Phelts RE

   . Multicorrelator techniques for robust mitigation of threats to GPS signal quality. Ph.D. Thesis. Department of Mechanical Engineering and the Committee on Graduate Studies, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; 2001.
8. 8.↵
   1. Liu F,
   2. Brenner M,
   3. Tang CY

   . Signal deformation monitoring scheme implemented in a prototype local area augmentation system ground installation. Proceedings of the 19th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS 2006). Fort Worth, TX; September 2006, pp. 367–380.
9. 9.↵
   1. Jiang Y,
   2. Milner C,
   3. Macabiau C

   . Code carrier divergence monitoring for dual-frequency GBAS. GPS Sol. 2017;21(2):769-781.
10. 10.↵
    1. Song J,
    2. Milner C,
    3. Selmi I,
    4. Bouterfas S,
    5. Julien O

    . Assessment of dual-frequency signal quality monitor to support CAT II/III GBAS. Proceedings of the 32nd International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS + 2019). Miami, Fl; September 2019, pp. 508–518.
11. 11.↵
    1. Pagot J-B

    . Modeling and monitoring of new GNSS signal distortions in the context of civil aviation. PhD Dissertation. Ecole Nationale de l’Aviation Civile, France; 2016.
12. 12.↵
    Baseline development standards for the validation of draft Annex 10, Volume I amendments relating to dual-frequency, multi-constellation(DFMC) SBAS, Appendix A to the Report on Agenda Item 2. 5th Meeting of the Navigation Systems Panel (NSP/5); 2018.
13. 13.↵
    1. Shively CA

    . Derivation of acceptable error limits for satellite signal faults in LAAS. Proceedings of the 1999 12th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GPS 1999). Nashville, TN; September 1999, pp. 761–770.
14. 14.↵
    1. Zaugg T

    . A new evaluation of maximum allowable errors and missed detection probabilities for LAAS ranging source monitors. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of The Institute of Navigation and CIGTF 21st Guidance Test Symposium. Albuquerque, NM; June 2002, pp. 187–194.
15. 15.↵
    1. Rife J,
    2. Phelts RE

    . Formulation of a time-varying maximum allowable error for ground-based augmentation systems. IEEE Trans Aero Electron Syst. 2008;44(2):548-560.
16. 16.↵
    1. SESAR

    . D3.7.1 monitoring, integrity and performance, 03.00.00, November 2015.
17. 17.↵
    1. Simili DV,
    2. Pervan B

    . Code-carrier divergence monitoring for the GPS local area augmentation system. Proceedings of IEEE/-ION PLANS 2006. San Diego, CA; April 2006, pp. 483-493.
18. 18.↵
    1. Hwang PY,
    2. McGraw GA,
    3. Bader JR

    . Enhanced differential GPS carrier-smoothed code processing using dual-frequency measurements. Navigation. 1999;46:127-138.
19. 19.↵
    1. Pervan B,
    2. Khanafseh S,
    3. Patel J

    . Test statistic auto- and cross-correlation effects on monitor false alert and missed detection probabilities. Proceedings of the 2017 International Technical Meeting of The Institute of Navigation. Monterey, CA; January 2017, pp. 562–590.
20. 20.↵
    1. EASA., CS AWO 1

    . Joint aviation requirements—all weather operations, Subpart 1: Automatic Landing Systems. EASA Report. February 2018. https://www.easa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/dfu/Easy%20Access%20Rules%20for%20CS-AWO.pdf.
21. 21.↵
    1. FAA Advisory Circular 120-28D

    . Criteria for approval of category III weather minima for takeoff, landing and rollout. July 13, 1999.
22. 22.↵
    Minimum operational performance standards (MOPS) for GPS local area augmentation system airborne equipment, RTCA DO-253C. Washington, DC; 2008.
23. 23.↵
    1. Milner C,
    2. Guilbert A,
    3. Macabiau C

    . Evolution of corrections processing for the MC/MF ground based augmentation system (GBAS). Proceedings of the 2015 International Technical Meeting of The Institute of Navigation. Dana Point, CA; January 2015, pp. 364–373.
24. 24.↵
    1. Julien O,
    2. Selmi I,
    3. Pagot J-B,
    4. Samson J,
    5. Fernandez FA

    . Extension of EWF threat model and associated SQM. Proceedings of the 2017 International Technical Meeting of The Institute of Navigation. Monterey, CA; January 2017, pp. 492–507.