Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • About Us
    • About NAVIGATION
    • Editorial Board
    • Peer Review Statement
    • Open Access
  • More
    • Email Alerts
    • Info for Authors
    • Info for Subscribers
  • Other Publications
    • ion

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
NAVIGATION: Journal of the Institute of Navigation
  • Other Publications
    • ion
  • My alerts
NAVIGATION: Journal of the Institute of Navigation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • About Us
    • About NAVIGATION
    • Editorial Board
    • Peer Review Statement
    • Open Access
  • More
    • Email Alerts
    • Info for Authors
    • Info for Subscribers
  • Follow ion on Twitter
  • Visit ion on Facebook
  • Follow ion on Instagram
  • Visit ion on YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Article
Open Access

Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) Universal Access Transceiver (UAT) transmissions for Alternative Positioning, Navigation, and Timing (APNT): Concept & practice

Sherman Lo and Yu-Hsuan Chen
NAVIGATION: Journal of the Institute of Navigation June 2021, 68 (2) 293-313; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/navi.424
Sherman Lo
Stanford GPS Lab, Aeronautics & Astronautics Department, Stanford University, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Yu-Hsuan Chen
Stanford GPS Lab, Aeronautics & Astronautics Department, Stanford University, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1

    Major sections and contributions of the paper

  • FIGURE 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2

    ADS-B radio stations deployed in the conterminous United States (CONUS)

  • FIGURE 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3

    Transmissions from ADS-B radio stations and ADS-B-equipped aircraft

  • FIGURE 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4

    Leon, West Virginia, ADS-B radio station on cellular tower (L) and notional antenna layout (R)

  • FIGURE 5
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5

    DMEs (squares), Tactical Air Navigation (TACANs) (circles), and ADS-B radio stations (pins) deployed in CONUS

  • FIGURE 6
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 6

    UAT frame and transmission structure based on descriptions and diagrams from (RTCA Special Committee-186, 2009)

  • FIGURE 7
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 7

    UAT ADS-B radio station tiers based on (Federal Aviation Administration Surveillance and Broadcast Services (SBS) Program Office, 2013)

  • FIGURE 8
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 8

    Notational layout of station tiers (L = low, M = medium, H = high, number = slot set used) figure from (Federal Aviation Administration Surveillance and Broadcast Services (SBS) Program Office, 2013)

  • FIGURE 9
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 9

    Example of UAT coverage from low-to-medium altitude tier; L and M tier station targets providing coverage to aircraft below 3,000 and 14,000 ft above ground level (AGL), respectively. Above 3,000 ft AGL, L tier stations may interfere with each other

  • FIGURE 10
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 10

    Histogram of pseudoranges from San Jose ADS-B radio station: All (top), Ground Segment (middle), ADS-B Segment (bottom)

  • FIGURE 11
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 11

    Histogram of pseudoranges from Woodside ADS-B radio station: All (top), Ground Segment (middle), ADS-B Segment (bottom)

  • FIGURE 12
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 12

    ADS-B elements of March 2015 flight test

  • FIGURE 13
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 13

    Airborne ADS-B collection rack shelf

  • FIGURE 14
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 14

    Test flight paths and ADS-B RS decoded (with slot numbers indicated)

  • FIGURE 15
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 15

    Range error from March 10, 2015, p.m. flight

  • FIGURE 16
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 16

    ADS-B radio stations in vicinity of flight test. Pin captions show station location name and UAT ground segment transmission slots assigned

  • FIGURE 17
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 17

    Interference between two UAT FIS-B on a signal amplitude (y-axis) versus time (x-axis) plot. Nominal UAT signal has constant amplitude envelope (Photo of inflight data display)

  • FIGURE 18
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 18

    Test flight paths and ADS-B RS decoded (with assigned slot numbers indicated); ADS-B RS sharing the same slots are circled with the same shade of color

  • FIGURE 19
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 19

    Average number of messages decoded per second versus distance for low- (left, 100% = 2 msg/sec) and medium- (right, 100% = 3 msg/sec) altitude tier stations (March 10, 2015, p.m.). Top number indicates seconds of data available for the average

  • FIGURE 20
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 20

    Average number of messages decoded per second versus distance for low- (left, 100% = 2 msg/sec) and medium- (right, 100% = 3 msg/sec) altitude tier stations (March 11, 2015, p.m.). Top number indicates seconds of data available for the average

  • FIGURE 21
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 21

    Reception map of Baltimore, OH, station (numbers indicate UAT ground segment slots assigned)

  • FIGURE 22
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 22

    Reception map of Urbana, OH, station (numbers indicate UAT ground segment slots assigned)

  • FIGURE 23
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 23

    Minimum altitude at which an L-band signal is in radio line of sight from a 25 m tower versus distance from the tower (radio horizon model using 4/3 earth radius assumption)

  • FIGURE 24
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 24

    Number of stations per time epoch on March 12, 2015, a.m. flight (cruise at 3,300 ft MSL)

  • FIGURE 25
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 25

    Number of stations per time epoch on March 11, 2015, p.m. flight (cruise at 10,500 ft MSL)

  • FIGURE 26
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 26

    Position results using GPS, UAT (iterative based on close initial guess) March 12 a.m. flight (minimum altitude of 300 m above ground level (AGL))

  • FIGURE 27
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 27

    Position results using GPS, UAT (iterative based on close initial guess) March 11 p.m. flight (minimum altitude of 300 m above ground level (AGL))

  • FIGURE 28
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 28

    Histogram of position error from March 11 p.m. (left) and 12 a.m. (right) flight; limit DOP < 10

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Comparison of Mode S ES and UAT for ADS-B

    ProtocolAdvantagesDisadvantages
    Mode S ESInternational standard
    Widely adopted
    Requires changes to signal to provide ranging
    Frequency congestion (used by other aviation systems)
    UATProvides PNT with minimal changes
    Higher data rates, more message data capacity
    Dedicated frequency
    US standard, not as commonly used
    Intra-system interference
    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    March 2015 flight altitudes

    Date/TimeCruise Altitude (MSL) ft
    March 10 a.m.6,000-7,000
    March 10 p.m.4,000-5,000
    March 11 p.m.10,500
    March 12 a.m.3,300
    March 12 p.m.10,300
    March 13 a.m.3,300
    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    UAT range error on March 10 p.m. flight

    StationMean (m)Accuracy (m; 2 σ)
    Ashland, KY 38.521.0
    Leon, OH 10.424.9
    Hillsboro, OH   3.219.6
    Baltimore, OH  -3.226.1
    London, OH-19.716.9
    Urbana, OH  -0.922.5
    Wooster, OH-28.915.4
    Bucyrus, OH   1.516.2
    Baltimore, OH (Ref)   -12.6
    • View popup
    TABLE 4

    UAT range accuracy (m, 2σ), March 2015 flight tests

    Station3/10 a.m.3/10 p.m.3/11 p.m.3/12 a.m.3/12 p.m.3/13 a.m.
    Elizabethton, TN26.724.0
    Wise, VA23.216.7
    Jackson, KY30.322.3
    Louisville, KY18.018.5
    Ashland, KY21.028.120.944.119.6
    Leon, WV17.624.926.427.518.625.4
    Falmouth, KY24.9
    Philippi, WV22.615.6
    Hillsboro, OH17.619.638.222.037.623.7
    Hamilton, OH32.518.831.322.0
    Shinnston, WV21.032.417.928.617.6
    Baltimore, OH27.526.129.723.219.023.6
    London, OH16.116.929.520.928.520.7
    Washington, PA20.020.019.8
    Urbana, OH17.722.529.332.830.619.2
    Butler, PA19.826.7
    Wooster, OH18.415.423.215.4
    Bucyrus, OH18.616.227.520.420.818.7
    Cleveland, OH26.822.5
    • View popup
    TABLE 5

    Comparison of positioning performance using iterative solution with different initial estimate sources: Bancroft’s method and initial guesses in error from truth (simulates using prior positions): March 11 p.m. flight

    All calculated positionsPositions with errors < = 10 kmPositions with errors > 10 km
    Method for initial estimateMean err (m)Stan. Dev. err (m)Number of PtsMean err (m)Stan. Dev. err (m)Number of PtsMean err (m)Stan. Dev. err (m)Number of Pts
    Bancroft96010,4418,14329.321.58,05681,94654,76587
    0.5°error (70 km) from true lat/lon3894,7718,58129.121.28,52653,00023,97555
    0.05°error (7 km) from true lat/lon29.522.38,58629.522.38,586N/AN/A0
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

NAVIGATION: Journal of the Institute of Navigation: 68 (2)
NAVIGATION: Journal of the Institute of Navigation
Vol. 68, Issue 2
Summer 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on NAVIGATION: Journal of the Institute of Navigation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) Universal Access Transceiver (UAT) transmissions for Alternative Positioning, Navigation, and Timing (APNT): Concept & practice
(Your Name) has sent you a message from NAVIGATION: Journal of the Institute of Navigation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the NAVIGATION: Journal of the Institute of Navigation web site.
Citation Tools
Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) Universal Access Transceiver (UAT) transmissions for Alternative Positioning, Navigation, and Timing (APNT): Concept & practice
Sherman Lo, Yu-Hsuan Chen
NAVIGATION: Journal of the Institute of Navigation Jun 2021, 68 (2) 293-313; DOI: 10.1002/navi.424

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) Universal Access Transceiver (UAT) transmissions for Alternative Positioning, Navigation, and Timing (APNT): Concept & practice
Sherman Lo, Yu-Hsuan Chen
NAVIGATION: Journal of the Institute of Navigation Jun 2021, 68 (2) 293-313; DOI: 10.1002/navi.424
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • 1 INTRODUCTION
    • 2 ADS-B UAT BACKGROUND
    • 3 PSEUDORANGING WITH UAT
    • 4 FLIGHT TEST OVERVIEW
    • 5 ANALYSIS OF UAT PERFORMANCE
    • 6 CONCLUSIONS
    • HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE
    • DISCLAIMERS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • ATLAS: Orbit Determination and Time Transfer for a Lunar Radio Navigation System
  • GNSS L5/E5a Code Properties in the Presence of a Blanker
  • Robust Interference Mitigation in GNSS Snapshot Receivers
Show more Original Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • APNT
  • ADS-B UAT

Unless otherwise noted, NAVIGATION content is licensed under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 License.

© 2025 The Institute of Navigation, Inc.

Powered by HighWire