High-Precision Vision Localization System for Autonomous Guided Vehicles in Dusty Industrial Environments

REFERENCES

1. ↵
   1. Agarwal, S.,
   2. Mierle, K.

   , & Others. (n.d.). Ceres solver. http://ceres-solver.org
2. ↵
   1. Ahmadinia, M.,
   2. Alinejad-Rokny, H., &
   3. Ahangarikiasari, H.

   (2014). Data aggregation in wireless sensor networks based on environmental similarity: A learning automata approach. Journal of Networks, 9(10), 2567. https://doi.org/10.4304/jnw.9.10.2567-2573
3. ↵
   1. Ahmadinia, M.,
   2. Meybodi, M. R.,
   3. Esnaashari, M., &
   4. Alinejad-Rokny, H.

   (2013). Energy-efficient and multi-stage clustering algorithm in wireless sensor networks using cellular learning automata. IETE Journal of Research, 59(6), 774–782. https://doi.org/10.4103/0377-2063.126958
4. ↵
   1. An, X.,
   2. Zhao, S.,
   3. Cui, X.,
   4. Shi, Q., &
   5. Lu, M.

   (2020). Distributed multi-antenna positioning for automatic-guided vehicle. Sensors, 20(4), 1155. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20041155
5. ↵
   1. Arthur, J.,
   2. Bowman, R., &
   3. Straw, R.

   (2008). Robotic laser coating removal system (Tech. Rep.). Air Force Research Lab Wright-Patterson AFB OH. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA608206
6. ↵
   1. Bai, M.,
   2. Huang, Y.,
   3. Chen, B.,
   4. Yang, L., &
   5. Zhang, Y.

   (2020). A novel mixture distributions-based robust Kalman filter for cooperative localization. IEEE Sensors Journal, 20(24), 14994–15006. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2020.3012153
7. ↵
   1. Bianchi, V.,
   2. Ciampolini, P., &
   3. De Munari, I.

   (2019). RSSI-based indoor localization and identification for ZigBee wireless sensor networks in smart homes. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 68(2), 566–575. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2018.2851675
8. ↵
   1. Boutteau, R.,
   2. Rossi, R.,
   3. Qin, L.,
   4. Merriaux, P., &
   5. Savatier, X.

   (2020). A vision-based system for robot localization in large industrial environments. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 99(2), 359–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-019-01114-x
9. ↵
   1. Bradski, G.

   (2000). The OpenCV library. Dr. Dobb’s Journal of Software Tools.
10. ↵
    1. Chen, C.,
    2. Wang, B., &
    3. Ye, Q.-T.

    (2004). Application of automated guided vehicle (AGV) based on inductive guidance for newsprint rolls transportation system. Journal of Donghua University, 21(2), 88–92. www.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-5220.2004.02.017
11. ↵
    1. Chen, Z.,
    2. Wang, G., &
    3. Hua, X.

    (2019). High-precise monocular positioning with infrared LED visual target. 2019 IEEE International Conference on Real-time Computing and Robotics (RCAR), Irkutsk, Russia. https://doi.org/10.1109/RCAR47638.2019.9044142
12. ↵
    1. Cho, H.,
    2. Kim, E. K., &
    3. Kim, S.

    (2018). Indoor SLAM application using geometric and ICP matching methods based on line features. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 100, 206–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2017.11.011
13. ↵
    1. He, C.,
    2. Tang, C., &
    3. Yu, C.

    (2020). A federated derivative cubature Kalman filter for IMU-UWB indoor positioning. Sensors, 20(12), 3514. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20123514
14. ↵
    1. Hofacker, S. A.

    (1993). Large aircraft robotic paint stripping (LARPS) system. SAE Transactions, 102, 11–21. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44739952
15. ↵
    1. Holmes, S.,
    2. Klein, G., &
    3. Murray, D. W.

    (2008). A square root unscented Kalman filter for visual monoSLAM. 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Pasadena, CA. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2008.4543780
16. 1. Hu, X.,
    2. Luo, Z., &
    3. Jiang, W.

    (2020). AGV localization system based on ultra-wideband and vision guidance. Electronics, 9(3), 448. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9030448
17. ↵
    1. Jazwinski, A.

    (2007). Stochastic processes and filtering theory. Dover Publications.
18. ↵
    1. Julier, S. J., &
    2. Uhlmann, J. K.

    (1997). New extension of the Kalman filter to nonlinear systems. In I. Kadar (Ed.), Signal Processing, Sensor Fusion, and Target Recognition VI (Vol. 3068, pp. 182–193). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.280797
19. ↵
    1. Kalman, R. E.

    (1960). A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Journal of Basic Engineering, 82(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3662552

    CrossRef
20. ↵
    1. Karkus, P.,
    2. Cai, S., &
    3. Hsu, D.

    (2021). Differentiable SLAM-net: Learning particle SLAM for visual navigation. Proc. of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2815–2825.
21. 1. Lee, J.,
    2. Hyun, C.-H., &
    3. Park, M.

    (2013). A vision-based automated guided vehicle system with marker recognition for indoor use. Sensors, 13(8), 10052–10073. https://doi.org/10.3390/s130810052
22. ↵
    1. Lepetit, V.,
    2. Moreno-Noguer, F., &
    3. Fua, P.

    (2009). EPnP: An accurate O(n) solution to the PnP problem. International Journal of Computer Vision, 81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-008-0152-6
23. ↵
    1. Li, B.,
    2. Hao, Z., &
    3. Dang, X.

    (2019). An indoor location algorithm based on Kalman filter fusion of ultra-wide band and inertial measurement unit. AIP Advances, 9(8). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5117341
24. ↵
    1. Li, S.,
    2. Xu, B.,
    3. Wang, L., &
    4. Razzaqi, A. A.

    (2020). Improved maximum correntropy cubature Kalman filter for cooperative localization. IEEE Sensors Journal, 20(22), 13585–13595. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2020.3006026
25. ↵
    1. Mur-Artal, R., &
    2. Tardós, J. D.

    (2017). ORB-SLAM2: An open-source SLAM system for monocular, stereo, and RGB-D cameras. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 33(5), 1255–1262. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2017.2705103
26. ↵
    1. Nguyen, T. H.,
    2. Nguyen, T.-M., &
    3. Xie, L.

    (2021). Range-focused fusion of camera-IMU-UWB for accurate and drift-reduced localization. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 6(2), 1678–1685. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2021.3057838
27. ↵
    1. Nørgaard, M.,
    2. Poulsen, N. K., &
    3. Ravn, O.

    (2000). New developments in state estimation for nonlinear systems. Automatica, 36(11), 1627–1638. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-1098(00)00089-3
28. ↵
    1. Ortiz-Fernandez, L. E.,
    2. Cabrera-Avila, E. V.,
    3. da Silva, B. M., &
    4. Gonçalves, L. M.

    (2021). Smart artificial markers for accurate visual mapping and localization. Sensors, 21(2), 625. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21020625
29. ↵
    1. Ronzoni, D.,
    2. Olmi, R.,
    3. Secchi, C., &
    4. Fantuzzi, C.

    (2011). AGV global localization using indistinguishable artificial landmarks. 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Shanghai, China. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2011.5979759
30. ↵
    1. Schulze, L., &
    2. Wullner, A.

    (2006). The approach of automated guided vehicle systems. 2006 IEEE International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics, Shanghai, China. https://doi.org/10.1109/SOLI.2006.328941
31. ↵
    1. Shule, W.,
    2. Almansa, C. M.,
    3. Queralta, J. P.,
    4. Zou, Z., &
    5. Westerlund, T.

    (2020). UWB-based localization for multi-UAV systems and collaborative heterogeneous multi-robot systems. Procedia Computer Science, 175, 357–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.07.051
32. ↵
    1. Song, Y.,
    2. Nuske, S., &
    3. Scherer, S.

    (2017). A multi-sensor fusion MAV state estimation from long-range stereo, IMU, GPS and barometric sensors. Sensors, 17(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17010011
33. ↵
    1. Sorkine-Hornung, O., &
    2. Rabinovich, M.

    (2017). Least squares rigid motion using SVD.
34. ↵
    1. Tang, J.,
    2. Zhu, W., &
    3. Bi, Y.

    (2020). A computer vision-based navigation and localization method for station-moving aircraft transport platform with dual cameras. Sensors, 20(1), 279. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20010279
35. ↵
    1. Tang, S.,
    2. Tang, C.,
    3. Huang, R.,
    4. Zhu, S., &
    5. Tan, P.

    (2021). Learning camera localization via dense scene matching. Proc. of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 1831–1841.
36. ↵
    1. Tao, B.,
    2. Wu, H.,
    3. Gong, Z.,
    4. Yin, Z., &
    5. Ding, H.

    (2021). An RFID-based mobile robot localization method combining phase difference and readability. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 18(3), 1406–1416. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2020.3006724
37. ↵
    1. Wu, X.,
    2. Sun, C.,
    3. Zou, T.,
    4. Xiao, H.,
    5. Wang, L., &
    6. Zhai, J.

    (2019). Intelligent path recognition against image noises for vision guidance of automated guided vehicles in a complex workspace. Applied Sciences, 9(19), 4108. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9194108
38. ↵
    1. Zhang, L.,
    2. Chen, Z.,
    3. Cui, W.,
    4. Li, B.,
    5. Chen, C.,
    6. Cao, Z., &
    7. Gao, K.

    (2020). WiFi-based indoor robot positioning using deep fuzzy forests. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 7(11), 10773–10781. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2020.2986685
39. ↵
    1. Zhuang, Y.,
    2. Wang, Q.,
    3. Shi, M.,
    4. Cao, P.,
    5. Qi, L., &
    6. Yang, J.

    (2019). Low-power centimeter-level localization for indoor mobile robots based on ensemble Kalman smoother using received signal strength. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 6(4), 6513–6522. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2019.2907707
40. ↵
    1. Zou, Q.,
    2. Sun, Q.,
    3. Chen, L.,
    4. Nie, B., &
    5. Li, Q.

    (2021). A comparative analysis of lidar SLAM-based indoor navigation for autonomous vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2021.3063477