High-Accuracy Static Baseline Estimation using NavIC L5 Observables

REFERENCES

1. ↵
   1. Althaf, A., &
   2. Hablani, H.

   (2020a). Assessment of errors in NacIC observables for stationary receivers. NAVIGATION, 67(2), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1002/navi.355
2. ↵
   1. Althaf, A., &
   2. Hablani, H.

   (2020b). NavIC signals multipath analysis, estimation and mitigation for high-accuracy positioning. Proc. of the 33rd International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS+ 2020), 2878–2895. https://doi.org/10.33012/2020.17632
3. ↵
   1. Ayyagari, D.,
   2. Chakraborty, S.,
   3. Das, S.,
   4. Shukla, A.,
   5. Paul, A., &
   6. Datta, A.

   (2020). Performance of NavIC for studying the ionosphere at an EIA region in India. Advances in Space Research, 65(6), 1544–1558. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2001.02964
4. ↵
   1. Chakraborty, S.,
   2. Datta, A.,
   3. Ray, S.,
   4. Ayyagari, D., &
   5. Paul, A.

   (2020). Comparative studies of ionospheric models with GNSS and NavIC over the Indian longitudinal sector during geomagnetic activities. Advances in Space Research, 66(4), 895–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2020.04.047
5. ↵
   1. Das, S.,
   2. Datta, S., &
   3. Shukla, A. K.

   (2020). Detection of thunderstorm using Indian navigation satellite NavIC. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 58(5), 3677–3684. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2019.2960035
6. ↵
   1. Desai, M., &
   2. Shah, S. N.

   (2018). The GIVE ionospheric delay correction approach to improve positional accuracy of NavIC/IRNSS single-frequency receiver. Current Science, 114(8), 1665–1676. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v114/i08/1665-1676
7. ↵
   1. Dey, A.,
   2. Joshi, L. M.,
   3. Chhibba, R., &
   4. Sharma, N.

   (2021). A study of ionospheric effects on IRNSS/NavIC positioning at equatorial latitudes. Advances in Space Research, 68(12), 4872–4883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2020.09.038
8. ↵
   1. Eueler, H.-J., &
   2. Goad, C. C.

   (1991). On optimal filtering of GPS dual frequency observations without using orbit information. Bulletin Géodésique, 65, 130–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00806368
9. ↵
   1. Farrell, J. A.

   (2008). Aided navigation - GPS with high rate sensors. McGraw-Hill.
10. ↵
    1. Goad, C. C.

    (1990). Optimal filtering of pseudoranges and phases from single-frequency GPS receivers. NAVIGATION, 37(3), 249–262. https://www.ion.org/publications/abstract.cfm?articleID=100253
11. ↵
    1. Gupta, N., &
    2. Raphael, H.

    (2007). Kalman filtering with equality and inequality state constraints (Report No. 07/18). Oxford University Computing Laboratory. https://www.cs.ox.ac.uk/files/728/NA-07-18.pdf
12. ↵
    1. Kaplan, E. D., &
    2. Hegarty, C. J.

    (Eds.). (2006). Understanding GPS: Principles and applications. Artech House.
13. ↵
    1. Li, W.,
    2. Nadarajah, N.,
    3. Teunissen, P., &
    4. Khodabandeh, A.

    (2015). Single-frequency L5 PPP-RTK with GPS, IRNSS, QZSS and Galileo. Proc. of the 28th International Technical Meeting of the ION Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS+ 2015), Tampa, FL, 2643–2653. https://www.ion.org/publications/abstract.cfm?articleID=13022
14. ↵
    1. Ma, X.,
    2. Tang, C., &
    3. Wang, X.

    (2019). The evaluation of IRNSS/NavIC system’s performance in its primary and secondary service areas–data quality, usability and single point positioning. Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica, 54, 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-019-00246-8
15. ↵
    1. Misra, P., &
    2. Enge, P.

    (2011). Global positioning system: Signals, measurements, and performance. Ganga-Jamuna Press.
16. ↵
    1. Montenbruck, O.,
    2. Steigenberger, P., &
    3. Riley, S.

    (2015). IRNSS orbit determination and broadcast ephemeris assessment. Proc. of the 2015 International Technical Meeting of the Institute of Navigation, Dana Point, CA, 185–193. https://www.ion.org/publications/abstract.cfm?articleID=12616
17. ↵
    1. Shukla, A.,
    2. Thakkar, P., &
    3. Bhalla, S.

    (2018). NavIC relative positioning with smoothing filter and comparison with standalone NavIC. In M. Singh, P. K. Gupta, V. Tyagi, J. Flusser, & T. Ören (Eds.), Advances in computing and data sciences (pp. 413–422). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1813-9_41
18. ↵
    1. Sirikonda, S., &
    2. Parayitam, L.

    (2021). Integration of low-cost IMU with MEMS and NavIC/IRNSS receiver for land vehicle navigation. Proc. of the 34th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS+ 2021), St. Louis, MO, 2705–2717. https://doi.org/10.33012/2021.17958
19. ↵
    1. Teunissen, P. J. G.

    (1998). GPS carrier phase ambiguity fixing concepts. In P. J. G. Teunissen & A. Kleusberg (Eds.) GPS for Geodesy (pp. 319–388). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-72011-6_8
20. ↵
    1. Teunissen, P. J. G., &
    2. Montenbruck, O.

    (Eds.). (2017). Springer handbook of global navigation satellite systems. Springer International Publishing.
21. ↵
    1. Thoelert, S.,
    2. Montenbruck, O., &
    3. Meurer, M.

    (2014). IRNSS-1A: Signal and clock characterization of the Indian regional navigation system. GPS Solutions, 18, 147–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-013-0351-7
22. ↵
    1. Verhagen, S.,
    2. Li, B., &
    3. Teunissen, P.

    (2012). LAMBDA software package – Matlab implementation (Version 3.0). Delft University of Technology and Curtin University.
23. ↵
    1. Zaminpardaz, S.,
    2. Teunissen, P. J. G., &
    3. Nadarajah, N.

    (2017a). IRNSS/NavIC and GPS: a single- and dual-system L5 analysis. Journal of Geodesy, 91(8), 915–931. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-016-0996-4
24. ↵
    1. Zaminpardaz, S.,
    2. Teunissen, P. J. G., &
    3. Nadarajah, N.

    (2017b). IRNSS/NavIC single-point positioning: A service area precision analysis. Marine Geodesy, 40(4), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490419.2016.1269034