Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • About Us
    • About NAVIGATION
    • Editorial Board
    • Peer Review Statement
    • Open Access
  • More
    • Email Alerts
    • Info for Authors
    • Info for Subscribers
  • Other Publications
    • ion

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
NAVIGATION: Journal of the Institute of Navigation
  • Other Publications
    • ion
  • My alerts
NAVIGATION: Journal of the Institute of Navigation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • About Us
    • About NAVIGATION
    • Editorial Board
    • Peer Review Statement
    • Open Access
  • More
    • Email Alerts
    • Info for Authors
    • Info for Subscribers
  • Follow ion on Twitter
  • Visit ion on Facebook
  • Follow ion on Instagram
  • Visit ion on YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Article
Open Access

Robust Modeling of GNSS Orbit and Clock Error Dynamics

Elisa Gallon, Mathieu Joerger, and Boris Pervan
NAVIGATION: Journal of the Institute of Navigation December 2022, 69 (4) navi.539; DOI: https://doi.org/10.33012/navi.539
Elisa Gallon
1Navigation Laboratory, Mechanical, Material and Aerospace Engineering Department, Illinois Institute of Technology, IL, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Mathieu Joerger,
2NAViTi Laboratory, Department of Aerospace and Ocean Engineering, Virginia Tech, VA, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Boris Pervan
1Navigation Laboratory, Mechanical, Material and Aerospace Engineering Department, Illinois Institute of Technology, IL, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Bendat, J. S., &
    2. Piersol, A. G.
    (2010). Random data: Analysis and measurement procedures. John Wiley & Sons.
  2. ↵
    1. Bryson, A. E.
    (2002). Applied linear optimal control: Examples and algorithms (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  3. ↵
    1. Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales (CNES)
    . (2019). Broadcast ephemeris repository. ftp://serenad-pub-lic.cnes.fr/SERENAD0/FROMNTMFV2/NAV/
  4. ↵
    1. DeCleene, B.
    (2000). Defining pseudorange integrity – overbounding. Proc. of the 13th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GPS 2000), Salt Lake City, UT, 1916–1924. https://www.ion.org/publications/abstract.cfm?articleID=1603
  5. ↵
    1. European GNSS Service Centre
    . (2021). Galileo satellite metadata. European Union Agency for the Space Programme. https://www.gsc-europa.eu/support-to-developers/galileo-satellite-metadata
  6. ↵
    1. Galileo OS-SDD
    . (2021). Open service: Service definition document v1.2. (Technical Report). European GNSS Service Centre. https://www.gsc-europa.eu/sites/default/files/sites/all/files/Galileo-OS-SDD_v1.2.pdf
  7. ↵
    1. Gallon, E.,
    2. Joerger, M.,
    3. Perea, S., &
    4. Pervan, B.
    (2019). Error model development for ARAIM exploiting satellite motion. Proc. of the 32nd International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS+ 2019), Miami, FL, 3162–3174. https://doi.org/10.33012/2019.17019
  8. ↵
    1. Gallon, E.,
    2. Joerger, M., &
    3. Pervan, B.
    (2020). Robust modeling of tropospheric delay dynamics for sequential positioning. 2020 IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium (PLANS), Portland, OR. https://doi.org/10.1109/PLANS46316.2020.9109969
  9. ↵
    1. Gallon, E.,
    2. Joerger, M., &
    3. Pervan, B.
    (2021). Robust modeling of GNSS tropospheric delay dynamics. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 57(5), 2992–3003. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2021.3068441
  10. ↵
    1. International GNSS Service (IGS)
    . (2020). International GNSS Service Antex files [IGS repository]. International GNSS Service File Access. https://files.igs.org/pub/station/general/pcv_archive/
  11. ↵
    1. Joerger, M., &
    2. Pervan, B.
    (2020). Multi-constellation ARAIM exploiting satellite motion. NAVIGATION, 67(2), 235–253. https://doi.org/10.1002/navi.334
  12. ↵
    1. Langel, S. E.
    (2014). Bounding estimation integrity risk for linear systems with structure stochastic modeling uncertainty [Doctoral dissertation, Illinois Institute of Technology].
  13. ↵
    1. Langel, S.,
    2. García Crespillo, O., &
    3. Joerger, M.
    (2020). A new approach for modeling correlated Gaussian errors using frequency domain overbounding. 2020 IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium (PLANS), Portland, OR. https://doi.org/10.1109/PLANS46316.2020.9110192
  14. ↵
    1. Levene, H.
    (1960). Robust tests for equality of variances. In I. Olkin (Ed.), Contributions to probability and statistics: Essays in honor of Harold Hotelling (pp. 278–292). Stanford University Press.
  15. ↵
    1. Massey Jr., F. J.
    (1951). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for goodness of fit. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 46(253), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.2307/2280095
    CrossRefWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    1. Montenbruck, O.,
    2. Steigenberger, P., &
    3. Hauschild, A.
    (2014). Broadcast versus precise ephemerides: A multi-GNSS perspective. GPS Solutions, 19, 321–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-014-0390-8
  17. ↵
    1. NASA CDDIS
    . (2020). Global navigation satellite system (GNSS) IGS Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX) products. NASA Archive of Space Geodesy Data. https://doi.org/10.5067/GNSS/GNSS_IGSMGEXP_001
  18. ↵
    1. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
    . (2021). Antenna offset solutions [Data repository]. https://geodesy.noaa.gov/ANTCAL/LoadFile?file=ngs14.atx
  19. ↵
    1. Perea Diaz, S.
    (2019). Design of an integrity support message for offline advanced RAIM [Doctoral dissertation, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen]. https://elib.dlr.de/133531/1/2019_Dis_Santiago%20Perea%20Diaz.pdf
  20. ↵
    1. Perea Diaz, S.,
    2. Meurer, M., &
    3. Pervan, B.
    (2020). Impact of sample correlation on SISRE overbound for ARAIM. NAVIGATION, 67(1), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1002/navi.346
  21. ↵
    1. Rife, J.,
    2. Pullen, S.,
    3. Enge, P., &
    4. Pervan, B.
    (2006). Paired overbounding for nonideal LAAS and WAAS error distributions. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 42(4), 1386–1395. https://www.doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2006.314579
  22. ↵
    1. Schenewerk, M.
    (2003). A brief review of basic GPS orbit interpolation strategies. GPS Solutions, 6(4), 265–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-002-0036-0
  23. ↵
    1. Stanford University
    . (2020). Stanford University GPS Lab ephemeris files. Stanford Department of Engineering. https://gps.stanford.edu/resources/software-tools/sugl-ephemeris-files
  24. ↵
    1. Steigenberger, P., &
    2. Montenbruck, O.
    (2020). Consistency of MGEX orbit and clock products. Engineering, 6(8), 898–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2019.12.005
  25. ↵
    1. Tanil, C.,
    2. Khanafseh, S.,
    3. Joerger, M., &
    4. Pervan, B.
    (2018). An INS monitor to detect GNSS spoofers capable of tracking vehicle position. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronics, 54(1), 131–143. https://www.doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2017.2739924
  26. ↵
    1. Teunissen, P. J. G., &
    2. Montenbruck, O.
    (2017). Springer handbook of Global Navigation Satellite Systems. Springer International Publishing. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42928-1
  27. ↵
    1. U.S. Air Force
    . (2020). NAVSTAR GPS space segment/navigation user segment interfaces (Technical Report No. IS-GPS-200). https://www.gps.gov/technical/icwg/IS-GPS-200L.pdf
  28. ↵
    1. Working Group C
    . (2012). ARAIM Technical Subgroup Interim Report (Technical Report). EU-U.S. Cooperation on Satellite Navigation. https://www.gps.gov/policy/cooperation/europe/2013/working-group-c/ARAIM-report-1.0.pdf
  29. ↵
    1. Working Group C
    . (2014). ARAIM Technical Subgroup Milestone 2 Report (Technical Report). EU-U.S. Cooperation on Satellite Navigation. https://www.gps.gov/policy/cooperation/europe/2015/working-group-c/ARAIM-milestone-2-report.pdf
  30. ↵
    1. Working Group C
    . (2016). ARAIM Technical Subgroup Milestone 3 Report (Technical Report). EU-U.S. Cooperation on Satellite Navigation. https://www.gps.gov/policy/cooperation/europe/2016/working-group-c/ARAIM-milestone-3-report.pdf
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

NAVIGATION: Journal of the Institute of Navigation: 69 (4)
NAVIGATION: Journal of the Institute of Navigation
Vol. 69, Issue 4
Winter 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on NAVIGATION: Journal of the Institute of Navigation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Robust Modeling of GNSS Orbit and Clock Error Dynamics
(Your Name) has sent you a message from NAVIGATION: Journal of the Institute of Navigation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the NAVIGATION: Journal of the Institute of Navigation web site.
Citation Tools
Robust Modeling of GNSS Orbit and Clock Error Dynamics
Elisa Gallon, Mathieu Joerger,, Boris Pervan
NAVIGATION: Journal of the Institute of Navigation Dec 2022, 69 (4) navi.539; DOI: 10.33012/navi.539

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Robust Modeling of GNSS Orbit and Clock Error Dynamics
Elisa Gallon, Mathieu Joerger,, Boris Pervan
NAVIGATION: Journal of the Institute of Navigation Dec 2022, 69 (4) navi.539; DOI: 10.33012/navi.539
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • 1 INTRODUCTION
    • 2 ORBIT AND CLOCK ERROR CHARACTERIZATION OVER TIME
    • 3 ERROR STATIONARITY ANALYSIS
    • 4 ROBUST MODELING OF ORBIT AND CLOCK ERRORS
    • 5 CONCLUSION
    • HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • APPENDIX A EPHEMERIS INTERPOLATION
    • APPENDIX B VARIANCE OF AUTOCORRELATION ESTIMATES
    • APPENDIX C SENSITIVITY OF PSD ESTIMATION TO PARAMETER SELECTION
    • APPENDIX D GPS AND GALILEO ORBIT AND CLOCK MEAN ERRORS
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • GNSS L5/E5a Code Properties in the Presence of a Blanker
  • Robust Interference Mitigation in GNSS Snapshot Receivers
  • Identification of Authentic GNSS Signals in Time-Differenced Carrier-Phase Measurements with a Software-Defined Radio Receiver
Show more Original Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • ARAIM
  • error modeling
  • GNSS
  • INS
  • integrity
  • Kalman filter
  • orbit error

Unless otherwise noted, NAVIGATION content is licensed under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 License.

© 2025 The Institute of Navigation, Inc.

Powered by HighWire