Article Figures & Data
Figures
- FIGURE 1
Observation locations used in simulator experiment
- FIGURE 2
Code minus carrier measurements and bias value without smoothing for PRN 3
- FIGURE 3
Code-minus-carrier measurements and bias value without smoothing for PRN 13
- FIGURE 4
FDCC detector test statistic and threshold under H0 (left distribution) and under H1 (right distribution)
- FIGURE 5
FDCC monitor signal for PRN 3
- FIGURE 6
FDCC monitor signal for PRN 3 over epoch 4
- FIGURE 7
FDCC monitor signal spectrum for PRN 3 over epoch 4
- FIGURE 8
30-s smoothed CMC for PRN 3 over the duration of simulated event
- FIGURE 9
FDCC monitor signal for PRN 13
- FIGURE 10
FDCC monitor signal for PRN 13 over epoch 4
- FIGURE 11
FDCC monitor signal spectrum for PRN 13 over epoch 4
- FIGURE 12
30-s smoothed CMC for PRN 13 over the duration of the simulated event
- FIGURE 13
CMC measurements and bias value with smoothing for PRN 3
- FIGURE 14
Doppler crossover observation times relative to stationary antenna crossover
Tables
Satellite (C/A code) PRN 13 PRN 3 Relative signal strength +10 dB −10 dB Maximum theoretical pseudorange error 0.59 m 5.91 m Self-interference concerns Requirement FDCC Detector applicability Pseudorange error bound 1.6 [m] with 10−9 probability Yes Time to alert 2 [s] Yes Reduced smoothing time constant 30 [s] Yes Ghost satellites No need to track all satellites that could introduce self-interference Yes Flex power Operate in the presence of large power differences between satellites Yes
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.