Global Navigation Satellite System Channel Coding Structures for Rapid Signal Acquisition in Harsh Environmental Conditions

REFERENCES

1. ↵
   1. Anghileri, M.,
   2. Paonni, M.,
   3. Gkougkas, E., &
   4. Eissfeller, B.

   (2012). Reduced navigation data for a fast first fix. In 2012 Sixth ESA Workshop on Satellite Navigation Technologies (NAVITEC 2012) & European Workshop on GNSS Signals and Signal Processing, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/NAVITEC.2012.6423105
2. ↵
   1. Biglieri, E.,
   2. Proakis, J., &
   3. Shamai, S.

   (1998). Fading channels: Information-theoretic and communications aspects. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 44(6), 2619–2692. https://doi.org/10.1109/18.720551
3. ↵
   1. Boutros, J.,
   2. Guillen i Fabregas, A. G.,
   3. Biglieri, E., &
   4. Zémor, G.

   (2010). Low-density parity-check codes for non-ergodic block-fading channels. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 56(9), 4286–4300. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2010.2053890
4. ↵
   1. Das, P.,
   2. Ortega, L.,
   3. Vilà-Valls, J.,
   4. Vincent, F.,
   5. Chaumette, E., &
   6. Davain, L.

   (2020). Performance limits of GNSS code-based precise positioning: GPS, Galileo & Meta-Signals. Sensors, 20(8), 2196. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20082196
5. ↵
   1. Galileo-ICD

   . (2021). Galileo - Open Service-Signal in Space Interface Control Document (OS SIS ICD V1.3) (Tech. Rep.). European Union. Retrieved from https://www.gsc-europa.eu/sites/default/files/sites/all/files/Galileo_OS_SIS_ICD_v2.0.pdf
6. ↵
   1. GPS-L1C-ICD

   . (2021). Interface Specification IS-GPS-800 NavStar GPS Space Segment/UserSegment L1C Interface (Tech. Rep.). Retrieved from https://www.gps.gov/technical/icwg/IS-GPS-800G.pdf
7. ↵
   1. Guillen i Fabregas, A., &
   2. Caire, G.

   (2006). Coded modulation in the block-fading channel: Coding theorems and code construction. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 52(1), 91–114. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2005.860414
8. ↵
   1. Knopp, R., &
   2. Humblet, P.

   (2000). On coding for block fading channels. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 46(1), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1109/18.817517
9. ↵
   1. Li, Z.,
   2. Chen, L.,
   3. Zeng, L.,
   4. Lin, S., &
   5. Fong, W. H.

   (2006). Efficient encoding of quasi-cyclic low-density parity-check codes. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 54(1), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2005.861667
10. ↵
    1. Liva, G., &
    2. Chiani, M.

    (2007). Protograph LDPC codes design based on EXIT analysis. IEEE Global Communications Conference (IEEE GLOBECOM 2007), 3250–3254. https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOCOM.2007.616
11. ↵
    1. Medina, D.,
    2. Ortega, L.,
    3. Vilà-Valls, J.,
    4. Closas, P.,
    5. Vincent, F., &
    6. Chaumette, E.

    (2020). Compact CRB for delay, doppler and phase estimation - application to GNSS SPP & RTK performance characterization. IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rsn.2020.0168
12. ↵
    1. Ortega, L.

    (2019). Signal optimization for Galileo evolution. PhD dissertation. Retrieved from https://oatao.univ-toulouse.fr/26975/
13. ↵
    1. Ortega, L., &
    2. Poulliat, C.

    (2021). On nested property of Root-LDPC codes. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 10(5), 1005–1009. https://doi.org/10.1109/LWC.2021.3054414
14. ↵
    1. Ortega, L.,
    2. Poulliat, C.,
    3. Boucheret, M. L.,
    4. Aubault, M., &
    5. Al-Bitar, H.

    (2018a). New solutions to reduce the Time-To-CED and to improve the CED robustness of the Galileo I/NAV Message. Proc. in IEEE/ION Position Location and Navigation Symposium (PLANS 2018), Monterey, California, 1399–1408. https://doi.org/10.1109/PLANS.2018.8373532
15. ↵
    1. Ortega, L.,
    2. Poulliat, C.,
    3. Boucheret, M.,
    4. Aubault, M., &
    5. Al-Bitar, H.

    (2018b). Co-design of message structure and channel coding scheme to reduce the time to CED and to improve the resilience for a Galileo 2nd generation new signal. Proc. of the 31st International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS+ 2018), Miami, Florida, 4064–4078. https://doi.org/10.33012/2018.15878
16. ↵
    1. Ortega, L.,
    2. Poulliat, C.,
    3. Boucheret, M.,
    4. Aubault, M., &
    5. Al-Bitar, H.

    (2018c). Advanced co-design of message structure and channel coding scheme to reduce the time to CED and to improve the resilience for a Galileo 2nd generation new signal. ESA Workshop on Satellite Navigation Technologies and European Workshop on GNSS Signals and Signal Processing (NAVITEC 2018), Noordwijk, The Netherlands. Retrieved from https://oatao.univ-toulouse.fr/22526/
17. ↵
    1. Ortega, L.,
    2. Poulliat, C.,
    3. Boucheret, M.,
    4. Aubault, M., &
    5. Al-Bitar, H.

    (2019). Optimal channel coding structures for fast acquisition signals in harsh environment conditions. Proc. of the 32nd International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS+ 2019), Miami, Florida, 4026–4040. https://doi.org/10.33012/2019.17113
18. ↵
    1. Ortega, L.,
    2. Poulliat, C.,
    3. Boucheret, M.,
    4. Aubault, M., &
    5. Al-Bitar, H.

    (2020). Optimizing the codesign of message structure and channel coding to reduce the TTD for a Galileo 2nd generation signal. NAVIGATION, 67(3), 471–492. https://doi.org/10.1002/navi.382
19. ↵
    1. Paonni, M., &
    2. Bavaro, M.

    (2013). On the design of a GNSS acquisition aiding signal. Proc. of the 26^th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS+ 2013), Nashville, TN, 1445–1456. Retrieved from https://www.ion.org/publications/abstract.cfm?articleID=11330
20. ↵
    1. Prieto-Cerdeira, R.,
    2. Perez-Fontan, F.,
    3. Burzigotti, P.,
    4. Bolea-Alamañ, A., &
    5. Sanchez-Lago, I.

    (2010). Versatile two-state land mobile satellite channel model with first application to DVB-SH analysis. International Journal of Satellite Communications and Networking, 28(5–6), 291–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/sat.964
21. ↵
    1. Richardson, T.,
    2. Shokrollahi, M., &
    3. Urbanke, R.

    (2001). Design of capacity-approaching irregular low-density parity-check codes. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 47(2), 619–637. https://doi.org/10.1109/18.910578
22. ↵
    1. Schotsch, B.,
    2. Anghileri, M.,
    3. Burger, T., &
    4. Ouedraogo, M.

    (2017). Joint Time-to-CED reduction and improvement of CED robustness in the Galileo I/NAV message. In Proc. of the 30th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS+ 2017), Portland, Oregon, 1544–1558. https://doi.org/10.33012/2017.15374
23. ↵
    1. Teunissen, P., &
    2. Montenbruck, O.

    (2017). Handbook of Global Navigation Satellite Systems. Springer International Publishing. Retrieved from https://books.google.fr/books?id=93goDwAAQBAJ
24. ↵
    1. Thorpe, J.

    (2003). Low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes constructed from protographs. IPN progress report, 42(154), 42–154. https://ipnpr.jpl.nasa.gov/progress_report/42-154/154C.pdf