Article Figures & Data
Figures
- FIGURE 1
Example of a sensor network structure in which the proposed method can be implemented
- FIGURE 2
The ADoA case in the system under consideration
- FIGURE 3
Distribution of PDoP values for five BSs: a) MS transmitter spacing of 0.01R, b) MS transmitter spacing of 0.03R, c) MS transmitter spacing of 0.1R
- FIGURE 4
RMSE of MS position estimation in the function of the variance of distance difference measurement errors (σ2) for NA and CRLB for different numbers of BSs: a) MS transmitter spacing of 0.01R, b) MS transmitter spacing of 0.03R, c) MS transmitter spacing of 0.1R
- FIGURE 5
CDFs of the absolute position error δ for the proposed method using NA It was assumed that
for the measurement error of the distance differences. - FIGURE 6
CDFs of the absolute position error δ for the proposed method using NA It was assumed that
for the measurement error of the distance differences. - FIGURE 7
CDFs of the absolute position error δ for the proposed method using NA It was assumed that
for the measurement error of the distance differences. - FIGURE 8
CDFs of the orientation error δorient for the proposed method using NA It was assumed that
for the measurement error of the distance differences. - FIGURE 9
CDFs of the orientation error δorient for the proposed method using NA It was assumed that
for the measurement error of the distance differences. - FIGURE 10
CDFs of the orientation error δorient for the proposed method using NA It was assumed that
for the measurement error of the distance differences.
Tables
Number of base stations Percentage of incorrect solutions One initial position with fixed orientation One initial position with variable orientation 3 34.9 28.2 4 --- 17.4 5 13.5 1.69 6 12.1 4.57 7 10.0 0.41 8 8.6 0.83 9 7.7 0.064 10 7.2 0.39 11 6.0 0.038 12 5.8 0.22
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.