Satellite Constellation Design for a Lunar Navigation and Communication System

REFERENCES

1. ↵
   1. Ansys

   . (2022). Systems Tool Kit (STK) [Accessed Mar 16, 2023]. https://www.ansys.com/products/missions/ansys-stk
2. ↵
   1. Balossino, A., &
   2. Davarian, F.

   (2022). The plan to give the Moon decent wireless coverage [Accessed Mar 16, 2023]. IEEE Spectrum. https://spectrum.ieee.org/lunar-communications
3. ↵
   1. Bhamidipati, S.,
   2. Mina, T., &
   3. Gao, G.

   (2021). Design considerations of a lunar navigation satellite system with time-transfer from Earth-GPS. Proc. of the 34th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS+ 2021), St. Louis, MO. 950–965. https://doi.org/10.33012/2021.18021
4. ↵
   1. Bhamidipati, S.,
   2. Mina, T., &
   3. Gao, G.

   (2022a). Time transfer from GPS for designing a SmallSat-based lunar navigation satellite system. NAVIGATION, 69(3). https://doi.org/10.33012/navi.535
5. ↵
   1. Bhamidipati, S.,
   2. Mina, T., &
   3. Gao, G.

   (2022b). A case study analysis for designing a lunar navigation satellite system with time-transfer from earth-GPS. Proc. of the 35th International Technical Meeting of the Institute of Navigation, Long Beach, CA. 407–419. https://doi.org/10.33012/2022.18202
6. ↵
   1. Bhamidipati, S.,
   2. Mina, T.,
   3. Sanchez, A., &
   4. Gao, G.

   (2022). A lunar navigation and communication satellite system with Earth-GPS time transfer: Design and performance considerations. Proc. of the International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS+ 2022), Denver, CO. 537–553. https://doi.org/10.33012/2022.18365
7. ↵
   1. Brown, C. D.

   (2002). Elements of spacecraft design. American Institute of Aeronautics; Astronautics, Inc. 447–502. https://doi.org/10.2514/5.9781600861796.0447.0502
8. ↵
   1. Capuano, V.,
   2. Basile, F.,
   3. Botteron, C., &
   4. Farine, P. A.

   (2015). GNSS-based orbital filter for Earth Moon transfer orbits. Journal of Navigation, 69(4), 745–764. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0373463315000843
9. ↵
   1. Cheetham, B.

   (2021). Cislunar autonomous positioning system technology operations and navigation experiment (CAPSTONE). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2021-4128.vid
10. ↵
    1. Cohen, B.,
    2. Lawrence, S.,
    3. Denevi, B.,
    4. Glotch, T.,
    5. Hurley, D.,
    6. Neal, C.,
    7. Robinson, M.,
    8. Watkins, R., &
    9. Weber, R.

    (2020). Lunar missions for the decade 2023–2033 [Accessed Mar 16, 2023]. A White Paper submitted to the 2023 Planetary Science Decadal Survey. https://www.lpi.usra.edu/leag/reports/LEAG-Mission-Priorities-v4.pdf
11. ↵
    1. Cozzens, T.

    (2021). Galileo will help lunar pathfinder navigate around Moon [Accessed Mar 16, 2023]. GPS World. https://www.gpsworld.com/galileo-will-help-lunar-pathfinder-navigate-around-moon
12. ↵
    1. Diller, G.

    (2006). NASA awards launch services for lunar mission [Accessed Mar 16, 2023]. NASA Newsworld. https://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2006/jul/HQ_C06042_LRO_contract.html
13. ↵
    1. Donaldson, J. E.,
    2. Parker, J. J.,
    3. Moreau, M. C.,
    4. Highsmith, D. E., &
    5. Martzen, P. D.

    (2020). Characterization of on-orbit GPS transmit antenna patterns for space users. NAVIGATION, 67(2), 411–438. https://doi.org/10.1002/navi.361
14. ↵
    1. Ely, T. A.

    (2005). Stable constellations of frozen elliptical inclined lunar orbits. The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 53(3), 301–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03546355
15. ↵
    1. Ely, T. A., &
    2. Lieb, E.

    (2006). Constellations of elliptical inclined lunar orbits providing polar and global coverage. The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 54(1), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03256476
16. ↵
    1. Esper, J.

    (2022). Draft lunanet interoperability specification (tech. rep.) [Accessed Mar 16, 2023]. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20220010998
17. ↵
    1. European Space Agency

    . (2021). Moonlight initiative: Lunar communications and navigation services (lcns) [Accessed Mar 16, 2023]. Call for Ideas and Use Cases. https://commercialisation.esa.int/opportunities/moonlight-initiative-lunar-communications-and-navigation-services-lcns-call-for-ideas-and-use-cases/
18. ↵
    1. European Space Agency

    . (2023). Remote terminal units [Accessed Mar 24, 2023]. https://www.esa.int/Enabling_Support/Space_Engineering_Technology/Onboard_Computers_and_Data_Handling/Remote_Terminal_Units
19. ↵
    1. Flahaut, J.,
    2. Carpenter, J.,
    3. Williams, J.-P.,
    4. Anand, M.,
    5. Crawford, I.,
    6. van Westrenen, W.,
    7. Füri, E.,
    8. Xiao, L., &
    9. Zhao, S.

    (2020). Regions of interest (ROI) for future exploration missions to the lunar south pole. Planetary and Space Science, 180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2019.104750
20. ↵
    1. Folta, D., &
    2. Quinn, D.

    (2006). Lunar frozen orbits. Proc. of the AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit, Keystone, CO, 6749. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2006-6749
21. ↵
    1. Hamera, K.,
    2. Mosher, T.,
    3. Gefreh, M.,
    4. Paul, R.,
    5. Slavkin, L., &
    6. Trojan, J.

    (2008). An evolvable lunar communication and navigation constellation concept. Proc. of the 2008 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1109/aero.2008.4526326
22. ↵
    1. Hirshorn, S. R.,
    2. Voss, L. D., &
    3. Bromley, L. K.

    (2017). NASA systems engineering handbook (tech. rep.).
23. ↵
    1. Iannone, C.,
    2. Carosi, M.,
    3. Eleuteri, M.,
    4. Stallo, C.,
    5. Lauro, C. D., &
    6. Musacchio, D.

    (2021). Four satellites to navigate the moon’s south pole: An orbital study. Proc. of the 34th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS+ 2021), St. Louis, MO. 981–1003. https://doi.org/10.33012/2021.18022
24. ↵
    1. Isik, O. K.,
    2. Hong, J.,
    3. Petrunin, I., &
    4. Tsourdos, A.

    (2020). Integrity analysis for GPS-based navigation of UAVs in urban environment. Robotics, 9(3), 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics9030066
25. ↵
    1. Israel, D. J.,
    2. Mauldin, K. D.,
    3. Roberts, C. J.,
    4. Mitchell, J. W.,
    5. Pulkkinen, A. A.,
    6. Cooper, L. V. D.,
    7. Johnson, M. A.,
    8. Christe, S. D., &
    9. Gramling, C. J.

    (2020). LunaNet: A flexible and extensible lunar exploration communications and navigation infrastructure. Proc. of the 2020 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/aero47225.2020.9172509
26. ↵
    1. Krawinkel, T., &
    2. Schön, S.

    (2015). Benefits of receiver clock modeling in code-based GNSS navigation. GPS Solutions, 20(4), 687–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-015-0480-2
27. ↵
    1. McManus, L., &
    2. Schaub, H.

    (2016). Establishing a formation of small satellites in a lunar flower constellation. The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 63(4), 263–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40295-016-0096-y
28. ↵
    1. Mortari, D.,
    2. Wilkins, M. P., &
    3. Bruccoleri, C.

    (2004). The flower constellations. The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 52(1–2), 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03546424
29. ↵
    1. Murata, M.,
    2. Kawano, I., &
    3. Kogure, S.

    (2022). Lunar navigation satellite system and positioning accuracy evaluation. Proc. of the 2022 International Technical Meeting of the Institute of Navigation, Long Beach, CA. 582–586. https://doi.org/10.33012/2022.18220
30. ↵
    1. Nallapu, R. T.,
    2. Vance, L. D.,
    3. Xu, Y., &
    4. Thangavelatham, J.

    (2020). Automated design architecture for lunar constellations. Proc. of the 2020 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1109/aero47225.2020.9172381
31. ↵
    1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration

    . (2006). Space communication architecture working group [Accessed Mar 16, 2023]. NASA Space Communication and Navigation Architecture Recommendations for 2005–2030. Final Report. https://syzygyengineering.com/2007/SCAWG_Report.pdf
32. ↵
    1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration

    . (2009). Lunar reconnaissance orbiter (LRO): Leading NASA’s way back to the moon; Lunar crater observation and sensing satellite (LCROSS): NASA’s mission to search for water on the Moon. Press Kit. https://www.nasa.gov/pdf/360020main_LRO_LCROSS_presskit2.pdf
33. ↵
    1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration

    . (2022). Lunar communications relay and navigation systems (LCRNS). Preliminary Lunar Relay Services Requirements Document (SRD). https://esc.gsfc.nasa.gov/projects/LCRNS
34. ↵
    1. Parker, J. J.,
    2. Dovis, F.,
    3. Anderson, B.,
    4. Ansalone, L.,
    5. Ashman, B.,
    6. Bauer, F. H.,
    7. D’Amore, G.,
    8. Facchinetti, C.,
    9. Fantinato, S.,
    10. Impresario, G.,
    11. McKim, S. A.,
    12. Miotti, E.,
    13. Miller, J. J.,
    14. Musmeci, M.,
    15. Pozzobon, O.,
    16. Schlenker, L.,
    17. Tuozzi, A., &
    18. Valencia, L.

    (2022). The lunar GNSS receiver experiment (LuGRE). Proc. of the 2022 International Technical Meeting of the Institute of Navigation, Long Beach, CA. 420–437. https://doi.org/10.33012/2022.18199
35. ↵
    1. Pereira, F., &
    2. Selva, D.

    (2020). Exploring the design space of lunar GNSS in frozen orbit conditions. Proc. of the IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium (PLANS 2020), Portland, OR. 444–451. https://doi.org/10.1109/plans46316.2020.9110202
36. ↵
    1. Pereira, F., &
    2. Selva, D.

    (2022). Analysis of navigation performance with lunar GNSS evolution. Proc. of the 2022 International Technical Meeting of the Institute of Navigation, Long Beach, CA. 514–529. https://doi.org/10.33012/2022.18210
37. ↵
    1. Proakis, J. G., &
    2. Salehi, M.

    (2008). Digital communications. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
38. ↵
    1. Rimani, J.,
    2. Mascolo, L., &
    3. Fraire, J. A.

    (2021). A parametric data handling evaluation framework for autonomous lunar networks. CEAS Space Journal, 14(2), 365–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12567-021-00390-4
39. ↵
    1. Schier, J.

    (2022). Lunanet overview [Accessed Mar 16, 2023]. NESCUnique Science from the Moon in the Artemis EraWorkshop. https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/lunanet_overview_to_nesc_lunar_science_workshop_2022-6-7.pdf
40. ↵
    1. Schmittberger, B. L., &
    2. Scherer, D. R.

    (2020). A review of contemporary atomic frequency standards. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.09987. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2004.09987.pdf
41. ↵
    1. Stutzman, W. L., &
    2. Thiele, G. A.

    (2013). Antenna theory and design (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1109/9780470544174.part1
42. ↵
    1. Tai, W.,
    2. Cosby, M.,&
    3. Lanucara, M.

    (2020). Lunar communications architecture study report (v1.2) [Accessed on Mar 16, 2023]. Interagency Operations Advisory Group, Lunar Communications Architecture Working Group. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20210006495
43. ↵
    1. Thompson, J.,
    2. Haygood, H., &
    3. Kezirian, M.

    (2010). Design and analysis of lunar communication and navigation satellite constellation architectures. Proc. of the AIAA SPACE 2010 Conference & Exposition, Anaheim, CA. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2010-8644
44. ↵
    1. Van Dierendonck, A. J., &
    2. McGraw, J.

    (1984). Relationship between Allan variances and Kalman filter parameters. Proc. of the 16th Annual Precise Time and Time Interval Systems and Applications Meeting, 273–293. https://www.ion.org/publications/abstract.cfm?articleID=16168
45. ↵
    1. Wertz, J. R.,
    2. Everett, D. F., &
    3. Puschell, J. J.

    (2011). Space mission engineering: The new SMAD. Microcosm Press. [Accessed on Aug 7, 2023] http://www.sme-smad.com
46. ↵
    1. Whitley, R., &
    2. Martinez, R.

    (2016). Options for staging orbits in cislunar space. Proc. of the 2016 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/aero.2016.7500635
47. ↵
    1. Winternitz, L. B.,
    2. Bamford, W. A.,
    3. Long, A. C., &
    4. Hassouneh, M.

    (2019). GPS based autonomous navigation study for the lunar Gateway. Proc. of the Annual American Astronautical Society (AAS) Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, (AAS 19-096), Breckenridge, CO.
48. ↵
    1. Zucca, C., &
    2. Tavella, P.

    (2005). The clock model and its relationship with the allan and related variances. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, 52(2), 289–296. https://doi.org/10.1109/tuffc.2005.1406554

    PubMed