Analytical and Empirical Navigation Safety Evaluation of a Tightly Integrated Lidar/IMU Using Return-Light Intensity

REFERENCES

1. ↵
   1. Bailey, T.

   (2002). Mobile robot localisation and mapping in extensive outdoor environments [Doctoral dissertation, University of Sydney]. https://www.personal.acfr.usyd.edu.au/tbailey/techreports/phdthesis.htm
2. ↵
   1. Bar-Shalom, Y.,
   2. Fortmann, T. E., &
   3. Cable, P. G.

   (1990). Tracking and data association. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87(2), 918–919. https://www.doi.org/10.1121/1.398863
3. ↵
   1. Blanch, J.,
   2. Walter, T., &
   3. Enge, P.

   (2019). Gaussian bounds of sample distributions for integrity analysis. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 55(4), 1806–1815. https://www.doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2018.2876583
4. ↵
   1. Bresson, G.,
   2. Féraud, T.,
   3. Aufrère, R.,
   4. Checchin, P., &
   5. Chapuis, R.

   (2015). Real-time monocular SLAM with low memory requirements. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 16(4), 1827–1839. https://www.doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2014.2376780
5. ↵
   1. Brown, R. G., &
   2. Hwang, P. Y. C.

   (2012). Introduction to random signals and applied Kalman filtering: With MATLAB exercises (4th ed.). John Wiley. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Introduction+to+Random+Signals+and+Applied+Kalman+Filtering+with+Matlab+Exercises%2C+4th+Edition-p-9780470609699
6. ↵
   1. Cooper, A. J.

   (2005). A comparison of data association techniques for simultaneous localization and mapping [Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology]. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/32438?show=full
7. ↵
   1. DeCleene, B.

   (2000). Defining pseudorange integrity - overbounding. Proc. of the 13th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GPS 2000), Salt Lake City, UT, 1916–1924. https://www.ion.org/publications/abstract.cfm?articleID=1603
8. ↵
   1. Dryanovski, I.,
   2. Valenti, R. G., &
   3. Xiao, J.

   (2013). Fast visual odometry and mapping from RGB-D data. Proc. of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Karlsruhe, Germany, 2305–2310. https://www.doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2013.6630889
9. ↵
   1. Fan, H.,
   2. Kucner, T. P.,
   3. Magnusson, M.,
   4. Li, T., &
   5. Lilienthal, A. J.

   (2018). A dual PHD filter for effective occupancy filtering in a highly dynamic environment. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 19(9), 2977–2993. https://www.doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2017.2770152
10. ↵
    1. Guivant, J., &
    2. Nebot, E.

    (2001). Optimization of the simultaneous localization and map-building algorithm for real-time implementation. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 17(3), 242–257. https://www.doi.org/10.1109/70.938382

    CrossRefWeb of Science
11. ↵
    1. Guivant, J.,
    2. Nebot, E., &
    3. Baiker, S.

    (2000). Localization and map building using laser range sensors in outdoor applications. Journal of Robotic Systems, 17(10), 565–583. https://www.doi.org/10.1002/1097-4563(200010)17:10<565::AID-ROB4>3.0.CO;2-6
12. ↵
    1. Guo, Y.,
    2. Sohel, F.,
    3. Bennamoun, M.,
    4. Wan, J., &
    5. Lu, M.

    (2014). An accurate and robust range image registration algorithm for 3D object modeling. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 16(5), 1377–1390. https://www.doi.org/10.1109/TMM.2014.2316145
13. ↵
    1. Hassani, A.,
    2. Joerger, M.,
    3. Arana, G. D., &
    4. Spenko, M.

    (2018). Lidar data association risk reduction using tight integration with INS. Proc. of the 31st International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS+ 2018), Miami, FL, 2467–2483. https://www.doi.org/10.33012/2018.15976
14. ↵
    1. Hassani, A.,
    2. Morris, N.,
    3. Spenko, M., &
    4. Joerger, M.

    (2019). Experimental integrity evaluation of tightly-integrated IMU/lidar including return-light intensity data. Proc. of the 32nd International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS+ 2019), Miami, FL, 2637–2658. https://www.doi.org/10.33012/2019.17095
15. ↵
    1. He, H.,
    2. Wang, K., &
    3. Sun, L.

    (2018). A SLAM algorithm of fused EKF and particle filter. Proc. of the 2018 WRC Symposium on Advanced Robotics and Automation (WRC SARA), Beijing, China, 172–177. https://www.doi.org/10.1109/WRC-SARA.2018.8584219
16. ↵
    1. Hess, W.,
    2. Kohler, D.,
    3. Rapp, H., &
    4. Andor, D.

    (2016). Real-time loop closure in 2D lidar SLAM. Proc. of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Stockholm, Sweden, 1271–1278. https://www.doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2016.7487258
17. ↵
    1. Hunde, A., &
    2. Ayalew, B.

    (2018). Automated multi-target tracking in public traffic in the presence of data association uncertainty. Proc. of the 2018 Annual American Control Conference (ACC), Milwaukee, WI, 300–306. https://www.doi.org/10.23919/ACC.2018.8431852
18. ↵
    1. International Civil Aviation Organization

    . (2006). Annex 10 to the convention on international civil aviation aeronautical telecommunications, radio navigation aids (6th ed., Vol. 1). https://store.icao.int/en/annex-10-aeronautical-telecommunications-volume-i-radio-navigational-aids
19. ↵
    1. Joerger, M.

    (2009). Carrier phase GPS augmentation using laser scanners and using low earth orbiting satellites [Doctoral dissertation, Illinois Institute of Technology]. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/carrier-phase-gps-augmentation-using-laser/docview/304898652/se-2
20. ↵
    1. Joerger, M.,
    2. Arana, G. D.,
    3. Spenko, M., &
    4. Pervan, B.

    (2017). Landmark data selection and unmapped obstacle detection in lidar-based navigation. Proc. of the 30th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS+ 2017), Portland, OR, 1886–1903. https://www.doi.org/10.33012/2017.15406
21. ↵
    1. Joerger, M.,
    2. Jamoom, M.,
    3. Spenko, M., &
    4. Pervan, B.

    (2016). Integrity of laser-based feature extraction and data association. Proc. of the 2016 IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium (PLANS), Savannah, GA, 557–571. https://www.doi.org/10.1109/PLANS.2016.7479746
22. ↵
    1. Joerger, M., &
    2. Pervan, B.

    (2009). Measurement-level integration of carrier-phase GPS and laser-scanner for outdoor ground vehicle navigation. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 131(2), 021004. https://www.doi.org/10.1115/1.3072122
23. ↵
    1. Joerger, M., &
    2. Pervan, B.

    (2017). Continuity risk of feature extraction for laser-based navigation. Proc. of the of the 2017 International Technical Meeting of the Institute of Navigation, Monterey, CA, 839–855. https://www.ion.org/publications/abstract.cfm?articleID=14899
24. ↵
    1. Joerger, M., &
    2. Pervan, B.

    (2019). Quantifying safety of laser-based navigation. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 55(1), 273–288. https://www.doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2018.2850381
25. ↵
    1. Kalra, N., &
    2. Groves, D. G.

    (2017). The enemy of good: Estimating the cost of waiting for nearly perfect automated vehicles. RAND Corporation. https://www.doi.org/10.7249/RR2150
26. ↵
    1. Kalra, N., &
    2. Paddock, S. M.

    (2016). Driving to safety: How many miles of driving would it take to demonstrate autonomous vehicle reliability? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 94, 182–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.09.010

    CrossRef
27. ↵
    1. Leonard, J. J., &
    2. Feder, H. J. S.

    (2000). A computationally efficient method for large-scale concurrent mapping and localization. Robotics Research, 169–176. Springer. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0765-1_21
28. ↵
    1. Luo, Z.,
    2. Mohrenschildt, M. V., &
    3. Habibi, S.

    (2020). A probability occupancy grid based approach for real-time lidar ground segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 21(3), 998–1010. https://www.doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2019.2900548
29. ↵
    1. Montemerlo, M., &
    2. Thrun, S.

    (2003). Simultaneous localization and mapping with unknown data association using fastSLAM. Proc. of the 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Taipei, Taiwan, 1985–1991. https://www.doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2003.1241885
30. ↵
    1. Nerurkar, E. D., &
    2. Roumeliotis, S. I.

    (2011). Power-SLAM: A linear-complexity, anytime algorithm for SLAM. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 30(6), 772–788. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0278364910390539

    CrossRef
31. ↵
    1. Nuss, D.,
    2. Yuan, T.,
    3. Krehl, G.,
    4. Stuebler, M.,
    5. Reuter, S., &
    6. Dietmayer, K.

    (2015). Fusion of laser and radar sensor data with a sequential monte carlo bayesian occupancy filter. Proc. of the 2015 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), Seoul, Korea (South), 1074–1081. https://www.doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2015.7225827
32. ↵
    1. Opromolla, R.,
    2. Fasano, G.,
    3. Rufino, G.,
    4. Grassi, M., &
    5. Savvaris, A.

    (2016). Lidar-inertial integration for UAV localization and mapping in complex environments. Proc. of the 2016 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), Arlington, VA, 649–656. https://www.doi.org/10.1109/ICUAS.2016.7502580
33. ↵
    1. Pirovano, L.,
    2. Principe, G., &
    3. Armellin, R.

    (2020). Data association and uncertainty pruning for tracks determined on short arcs. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 132(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-019-9947-8
34. ↵
    1. Pomerleau, F.,
    2. Colas, F.,
    3. Siegwart, R. Y., &
    4. Magnenat, S.

    (2013). Comparing ICP variants on real-world data sets. Autonomous Robots, 34, 133–148. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10514-013-9327-2

    CrossRef
35. ↵
    1. Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics (RTCA) Special Committee 159

    . (1996). Minimum Operational Performance Standards for Global Positioning System/Wide Area Augmentation System Airborne Equipment. RTCA. https://books.google.com/books?id=nXCRQQAACAAJ
36. ↵
    1. Reid, T. G.,
    2. Houts, S. E.,
    3. Cammarata, R.,
    4. Mills, G.,
    5. Agarwal, S.,
    6. Vora, A., &
    7. Pandey, G.

    (2019). Localization requirements for autonomous vehicles. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.01061. https://www.doi.org/10.4271/12-02-03-0012
37. ↵
    1. Reina, A., &
    2. Gonzales, J.

    (1997). Characterization of a radial laser scanner for mobile robot navigation. Proc. of the 1997 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robot and Systems. Innovative Robotics for Real-World Applications (IROS), Grenoble, France, 579–585. https://www.doi.org/10.1109/IROS.1997.655070
38. ↵
    1. Rife, J.,
    2. Pullen, S.,
    3. Enge, P., &
    4. Pervan, B.

    (2006). Paired overbounding for nonideal LAAS and WAAS error distributions. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 42(4), 1386–1395. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2006.314579
39. ↵
    1. Rogers, R. M.

    (2007). Applied mathematics in integrated navigation systems (3rd ed., Vol. 1). American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA). https://www.doi.org/10.2514/4.861598
40. ↵
    1. Sappa, A.,
    2. Restrepo-Specht, A., &
    3. Devy, M.

    (2001). Range image registration by using an edge-based representation. Proc. of the 9th International Symposium on Intelligent Robotic Systems (SIRS), Toulouse, France, Vol. 7, 167–176. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247330589_Range_Image_Registration_by_using_an_Edge-Based_Representation
41. ↵
    1. Soloviev, A.

    (2008). Tight coupling of GPS, laser scanner, and inertial measurements for navigation in urban environments. Proc. of the 2008 IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium (PLANS), Monterey, CA, 511–525. https://www.doi.org/10.1109/PLANS.2008.4570059
42. ↵
    1. Soloviev, A.,
    2. Bates, D., &
    3. Graas, F. V.

    (2007). Tight coupling of laser scanner and inertial measurements for a fully autonomous relative navigation solution. NAVIGATION, 54(3), 189–205. https://www.doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-4296.2007.tb00404.x
43. ↵
    1. Titterton, D.,
    2. Weston, J. L., &
    3. Weston, J.

    (2004). Strapdown inertial navigation technology (2nd ed., Vol. 17). Institution of Electrical Engineers. OCLC: 64573284 https://doi.org/10.1049/PBRA017E
44. ↵
    1. Vosselman, G., &
    2. Dijkman, S.

    (2001). 3D building model reconstruction from point clouds and ground plans. Proc. of the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Workshop (ISPRS), Annapolis, MD, 37–43. http://www.isprs.org/proceedings/XXXIV/3-W4/pdf/Vosselman.pdf
45. ↵
    1. Working Group C

    . (2016). ARAIM Technical Subgroup, Milestone 3 Report (Tech. Rep.). EU-US Cooperation on Satellite Navigation. https://www.gps.gov/policy/cooperation/europe/2016/working-group-c/ARAIM-milestone-3-report.pdf
46. ↵
    1. Ye, C., &
    2. Borenstein, J.

    (2002). Characterization of a 2D laser scanner for mobile robot obstacle negotiation. Proc. of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Washington, DC, Vol. 3, 2512–2518. https://www.doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2002.1013609
47. ↵
    1. Zheng, B., &
    2. Zhang, Z.

    (2019). An improved EKF-SLAM for Mars surface exploration. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7637469