Expanding Network RTK Coverage Using an Ionospheric-Free Combination and Kriging for Tropospheric Delay

REFERENCES

1. ↵
   1. Al-Shaery, A.,
   2. Lim, S., &
   3. Rizos, C.

   (2010). Functional models of ordinary kriging for medium range real-time kinematic positioning based on the virtual reference station technique. Proc. of the 23rd International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS 2010), Portland, OR, 2513–2521. https://www.ion.org/publications/abstract.cfm?articleID=9359
2. ↵
   1. Al-Shaery, A.,
   2. Lim, S., &
   3. Rizos, C.

   (2011). Investigation of different interpolation models used in network-RTK for the virtual reference station technique. Journal of Global Positioning Systems, 10(2), 136–148. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=23b87aafc841a546806cbb1e3137aca0fb3b2a56
3. ↵
   1. Askne, J., &
   2. Nordius, H.

   (1987). Estimation of tropospheric delay for microwaves from surface weather data. Radio Science, 22(3), 379–386. https://doi.org/10.1029/RS022i003p00379

   CrossRefWeb of Science
4. ↵
   1. Blanch, J.

   (2003). Using Kriging to bound satellite ranging errors due to the ionosphere [Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University]. Stanford, California, USA. https://web.stanford.edu/group/scpnt/gpslab/pubs/theses/JuanBlanchThesis03.pdf
5. ↵
   1. Blanch, J.,
   2. Walter, T., &
   3. Enge, P.

   (2004). Ionospheric estimation using extended Kriging for a low latitude SBAS. Proc. of the 17th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS 2004), Long Beach, CA, 387–391. https://www.ion.org/publications/abstract.cfm?articleID=5717
6. ↵
   1. Bolton, D.

   (1980). The computation of equivalent potential temperature. Monthly Weather Review, 108(7), 1046–1053. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1980)108<1046:TCOEPT>2.0.CO;2

   CrossRefWeb of Science
7. ↵
   1. Dai, L.,
   2. Han, S.,
   3. Wang, J., &
   4. Rizos, C.

   (2003). Comparison of interpolation algorithms in network-based GPS techniques. NAVIGATION, 50(4), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-4296.2003.tb00335.x
8. ↵
   1. Darugna, F.,
   2. Bolmgren, K. H. A.,
   3. Schmitz, M.,
   4. Schon, S.,
   5. Wubbena, J. B.,
   6. Wubbena, G.,
   7. Bruno, J., &
   8. Mitchell, C. N.

   (2021). Mitigation of severe weather events and TID impact on the interpolation of SSR atmospheric parameters. Advances in Space Research, 68(6), 2401–2420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2021.04.038
9. ↵
   1. El-Mowafy, A.

   (2012). Precise real-time positioning using network RTK. Global Navigation Satellite Systems: Signal, Theory and Applications, 7, 161–188. https://doi.org/10.5772/29502
10. ↵
    1. Euler, H. J.,
    2. Keenan, C. R.,
    3. Zebhauser, B. E., &
    4. Wübbena, G.

    (2001). Study of a simplified approach in utilizing information from permanent reference station arrays. Proc. of the 14th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GPS 2001), Salt Lake City, UT, 379–391. https://www.ion.org/publications/abstract.cfm?articleID=1727
11. ↵
    1. Euler, H. J.,
    2. Seeger, S.,
    3. Zelzer, O.,
    4. Takac, F., &
    5. Zebhauser, B. E.

    (2004). Improvement of positioning performance using standardized network RTK messages. Proc. of the 2004 National Technical Meeting of the Institute of Navigation, San Diego, CA, 453–461. https://www.ion.org/publications/abstract.cfm?articleID=5521
12. ↵
    1. Feng, Y., &
    2. Li, B.

    (2008). A benefit of multiple carrier GNSS signals: Regional scale network-based RTK with doubled inter-station distances. Journal of Spatial Science, 53(2), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/14498596.2008.9635154
13. ↵
    1. Gao, Y.,
    2. Li, Z., &
    3. McLellan, J. F.

    (1997). Carrier phase based regional area differential GPS for decimeter-level positioning and navigation. Proc. of the 10th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GPS 1997), Kansas City, MO, 1305–1313. https://www.ion.org/publications/abstract.cfm?articleID=2916
14. ↵
    1. Geisler, I.

    (2006). Performance improvement of network RTK positioning. Proc. of the 2006 National Technical Meeting of the Institute of Navigation, Monterey, CA, 869–880. https://www.ion.org/publications/abstract.cfm?articleID=6591
15. ↵
    1. Grejner-Brzezinska, D. A.,
    2. Kashani, I., &
    3. Wielgosz, P.

    (2005). On accuracy and reliability of instantaneous network RTK as a function of network geometry, station separation, and data processing strategy. GPS Solutions, 9(3), 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-005-0130-1
16. ↵
    1. Han, S., &
    2. Rizos, C.

    (1996). GPS network design and error mitigation for real-time continuous array monitoring systems. Proc. of the 9th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GPS 1996), Kansas City, MO, 1827–1836. https://www.ion.org/publications/abstract.cfm?articleID=2720
17. ↵
    1. Kim, D.,
    2. Song, J.,
    3. Han, D.,
    4. Yu, S.,
    5. Kee, C.,
    6. Seo, S., &
    7. Park, J.

    (2017). Modified kriging based double-difference tropospheric correction interpolation method for network RTK user. Proc. of the 30th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS+ 2017), Portland, OR, 4090–4102. https://doi.org/10.33012/2017.15350
18. ↵
    1. Leandro, R. F.,
    2. Langley, R. B., &
    3. Santos, M. C.

    (2008). UNB3m_pack: A neutral atmosphere delay package for radiometric space techniques. GPS Solutions, 12, 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-007-0077-5.
19. ↵
    1. Leandro, R. F.,
    2. Santos, M., &
    3. Langley, R. B.

    (2006). UNB neutral atmosphere models: Development and performance. Proc. of the 2006 National Technical Meeting of the Institute of Navigation, Monterey, CA, 564–573. https://www.ion.org/publications/abstract.cfm?articleID=6562
20. ↵
    1. Ma, H.,
    2. Zhao, Q.,
    3. Verhagen, S.,
    4. Psychas, D., &
    5. Dun, H.

    (2020). Kriging interpolation in modeling tropospheric wet delay. Atmosphere, 11(10), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11101125

    CrossRef
21. ↵
    1. Mendes, V. B.

    (1999). Modeling the neutral-atmospheric propagation delay in radiometric space techniques. UNB geodesy and geomatics engineering technical report, 199(10), 378. https://gge.ext.unb.ca/Pubs/TR199.pdf
22. ↵
    1. Park, B.

    (2008). A study on reducing temporal and spatial decorrelation effect in GNSS augmentation system: Consideration of the correction message standardization [Ph.D. dissertation, School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Seoul National University]. Seoul, Korea.
23. ↵
    1. Park, B., &
    2. Kee, C.

    (2010). The compact network RTK method: An effective solution to reduce GNSS temporal and spatial decorrelation error. Journal of Navigation, 63(2), 343–362. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463309990440
24. ↵
    1. Pu, Y.,
    2. Song, M., &
    3. Yuan, Y.

    (2021). Modified interpolation method of multi-reference station tropospheric delay considering the influence of height difference. Remote Sensing, 13(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13152994
25. ↵
    1. Rizos, C., &
    2. Han, S.

    (2003). Reference station network based RTK systems-concepts and progress. Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences, 8(2), 566–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02899820
26. ↵
    1. Saastamoinen, J.

    (1972). Atmospheric correction for the troposphere and stratosphere in radio ranging satellites. The Use of Artificial Satellites for Geodesy, 15, 247–251. https://doi.org/10.1029/GM015p0247

    CrossRef
27. ↵
    1. Shin, M. Y.,
    2. Han, Y., &
    3. Cho, D. J.

    (2014). An analysis for irregularity of tropospheric delay error between network stations during local atmospheric change. Proc. of the 2014 International Technical Meeting of the Institute of Navigation, San Diego, CA, 695–699. https://www.ion.org/publications/abstract.cfm?articleID=11541
28. ↵
    1. Song, J.

    (2016). A study on improving performance of network RTK through tropospheric modeling for land vehicle applications [Ph.D. dissertation, School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Seoul National University]. Seoul, Korea.
29. ↵
    1. Song, J.,
    2. Park, B., &
    3. Kee, C.

    (2016). Comparative analysis of height-related multiple correction interpolation methods with constraints for network RTK in mountainous areas. Journal of Navigation, 69(5), 991–1010. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463316000011
30. ↵
    1. Teunissen, P.

    (1993). Least-squares estimation of the integer GPS ambiguities. Proc. of the Invited Lecture, Section IV Theory and Methodology, IAG General Meeting, Beijing, China, 1–16. https://gnss.curtin.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/sites/21/2016/04/Teunissen1993Least.pdf
31. ↵
    1. Teunissen, P.

    (1995). The least-squares ambiguity decorrelation adjustment: A method for fast GPS integer ambiguity estimation. Journal of Geodesy, 70, 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00863419
32. ↵
    1. Teunissen, P.

    (2013). GNSS integer ambiguity validation: Overview of theory and methods. Proc. of the ION 2013 Pacific PNT Meeting, Honolulu, Hawaii, 673–684. https://www.ion.org/publications/abstract.cfm?articleID=11030
33. ↵
    1. Teunissen, P.,
    2. De Jonge, P., &
    3. Tiberius, C.

    (1997). Performance of the LAMBDA method for fast GPS ambiguity resolution. NAVIGATION, 44(3), 373–383. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-4296.1997.tb02355.x
34. ↵
    1. Wanninger, L.

    (1995). Improved ambiguity resolution by regional differential modelling of the ionosphere. Proc. of the 8th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GPS 1995), Palm Springs, CA, 55–62. https://www.ion.org/publications/abstract.cfm?articleID=2314
35. ↵
    1. Webster, R., &
    2. Oliver, M. A.

    (2007). Geostatistics for environmental scientists (2nd ed.). John Wiley and Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470517277
36. ↵
    1. Wielgosz, P.,
    2. Kashani, I., &
    3. Grejner-Brzezinska, D.

    (2005). Analysis of long-range network RTK during a severe ionospheric storm. Journal of Geodesy, 79(9), 524–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-005-0003-y
37. ↵
    1. Wubbena, G., &
    2. Bagge, A.

    (2002). RTCM message type 59-FKP for transmission of FKP [White paper]. Geo++, 1–7.
38. ↵
    1. Younes, S. A. M.

    (2016). Modeling investigation of wet tropospheric delay error and precipitable water vapor content in Egypt. Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 19(2), 333–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2016.05.002
39. ↵
    1. Zebhauser, B. E.,
    2. Euler, H. J.,
    3. Keenan, C. R., &
    4. Wübbena, G.

    (2002). A novel approach for the use of information from reference station networks conforming to RTCM V2.3 and future V3.0. Proc. of the –2002 IEEE PLANS, Position Location and Navigation Symposium (Vol. 104 320–327). https://doi.org/10.1109/plans.2002.998925
40. ↵
    1. Zhang, S.,
    2. Lim, S.,
    3. Rizos, C., &
    4. Guo, J.

    (2009). Atmosphere decomposition for VRS-based network-RTK system. Proc. of the 22nd International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS 2009), Savannah, GA, 2707–2716. https://www.ion.org/publications/abstract.cfm?articleID=8685
41. ↵
    1. Zheng, Y., &
    2. Feng, Y.

    (2005), Interpolating residual zenith tropospheric delays for improved regional area differential GPS positioning. NAVIGATION, 52(3) 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-4296.2005.tb01744.x