TABLE 3

Evaluation Performance in Urban Environments: Average Positioning Errors (Mean±Standard Deviation) Along Different Axes and Total Distance in the ECEF Coordinate System for Different Methods with Corresponding Optimal Parameters

MTV (Urban)LAX (Urban)
X (m)Y (m)Z (m)Total distance (m)X (m)Y (m)Z (m)Total distance (m)
WLS2.28±2.033.51±2.562.65±2.455.61±3.222.72±1.913.83±2.663.76±2.316.73±2.77
KF (baseline)1.25±0.942.45±1.071.26±0.773.40±1.122.29±1.373.25±1.863.20±1.495.63±1.73
KF+Deep sets (Zaheer et al., 2017)1.36±0.982.06±1.361.74±1.423.34±1.682.50±1.792.75±1.952.96±1.835.40±1.97
KF+Set-transformer (Kanhere et al., 2021)1.17±0.991.93±1.701.94±1.443.33±1.943.19±2.362.57±2.052.75±2.465.81±2.53
KF+GCNN (Mohanty & Gao, 2022)1.16±0.892.19±1.201.23±0.993.09±1.162.44±1.852.79±1.832.75±2.075.29±2.09
KF+A3C (Zhang & Masoud, 2020)1.26±0.952.03±1.091.46±0.733.14±0.972.44±1.722.85±1.693.10±1.725.39±1.84
KF+LSTMPPO (Zhao et al., 2023)1.30±1.332.07±1.101.34±0.733.13±1.012.45±1.732.70±1.653.03±1.695.26±1.79
KF+LSTMPPO-ARAM1.25±0.902.06±1.141.36±0.783.09±1.032.38±1.592.67±1.642.96±1.785.11±1.73