TABLE 3

Architectures 1–13 are examples of architectures in the fuzzy Pareto front (ranking ≤ 3) that achieve GDOP availability ≥ 98% and a station-keeping ΔV ≤ 250m/s per satellite/year. For reference, Arch. ID 14 is the 30-satellite architecture with best GDOP performance. Arch. 15 is the architecture with best GDOP performance overall.

IDSMA [km]TPFei [deg]ω [deg]SMA2 [km]T2P2F2e2i2 [deg]ω2[deg]GDOP [98th PCTL]GDOP Availabiltity [%]Space segment cost [FY20 $M]Station-keeping ΔV[m/s]Impact of SSF [%]
16691131394.9E-0390.519071988214.9E-03179.732704.8898.98406.8242.113.00
266301414104.2E-0390.539065348214.5E-03179.742704.2699.52419.2229.382.56
3566415534.0E-0387.429074128431.6E-02173.91904.6899.75438.1246.451.43
455131616104.4E-0386.849071778802.0E-02179.662703.7099.96448.4225.131.13
5573024305.7E-0389.32903.6299.72452.5248.450.93
65734171724.0E-0395.199079948862.0E-03178.342703.4399.98470.3246.270.21
7591918944.4E-0390.069071988218.4E-03179.752703.55100481.9231.830.50
8519527323.5E-0488.262703.85100493.4231.340.39
96001191921.2E-0395.149050039961.9E-03178.342703.36100508.9225.250.07
105754191925.4E-0494.67270841010101.5E-02177.982703.06100532.8240.200.03
11586727301.6E-0389.0327085433101.9E-02178.42903.11100548.4248.850.04
12726224324.7E-0388.8427053379106.1E-03177.782702.35100597.0246.690
13632030322.1E-0388.459076659931.3E-020.162702.08100688.6245.500
14699930321.6E-0391.66902.72100562.7288.430
15859230314.0E-0388.29270704910108.9E-03178.692701.85100730.9296.880