TABLE 1

Power Sharing Comparison

Signal	Power Sharing (%)
	Case 1			Case 2			Case 3
	P₀	A1	A2	P₀	A1	A2	P₀	A1	A2
S1	20	18.17	18.20	22	15.79	16.84	20	12.00	14.74
S2	20	18.17	18.20	22	15.79	16.84	30	18.00	22.11
S3	10	9.09	9.1	12	8.61	9.19	20	12.00	14.74
S4	50	45.43	45.49	44	31.59	33.68	30	18.00	22.11
IM1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2.94
IM2	0	0	0	0	0	4.32	0	0	2.94
IM3	0	0	0	0	0	4.32	0	0	2.91
IM4	0	0	0	0	0	4.32	0	0	2.93
IM5	0	0	0	0	0	4.32	0	0	2.92
IM6	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2.94
IM7	0	4.37	5.18	0	8.52	0.66	0	8.04	0.09
IM8	0	3.46	3.01	0	19.26	3.9	0	11.95	1.34
IM9	0	0.65	0.41	0	0.21	0.80	0	8.04	0.09
IM10	0	0.65	0.41	0	0.21	0.80	0	11.95	1.36
IM11	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
IM12	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
η	100	90.86	90.98	100	71.79	76.56	100	60.00	73.70

Note: A1: CEMIC method; A2: Modified CEMIC method (Proposed); S-1 to S-4: Main signal components; IM-1 to IM-12: Inter-modulation terms; η: Multiplexing efficiency; and P₀ is the initial/desired power sharing