Euclidean Distance Matrix-Based Rapid Fault Detection and Exclusion

REFERENCES

1. ↵
   1. Ahn, H. -S., &
   2. Oh, K. -K.

   (2010). Command coordination in multi-agent formation: Euclidean distance matrix approaches. ICCAS 2010 - International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems, 1592–1597. https://doi.org/10.1109/iccas.2010.5669671
2. ↵
   1. Bilich, A., &
   2. Larson, K. M.

   (2007). Mapping the GPS multipath environment using the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Radio Science, 42(6). https://doi.org/10.1029/2007RS003652
3. ↵
   1. Blanch, J.,
   2. Walter, T., &
   3. Enge, P.

   (2012). Satellite navigation for aviation in 2025. Proc. of the IEEE, 100, 1821–1830. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2012.2190154
4. ↵
   1. Borowski, H.,
   2. Isoz, O.,
   3. Eklöf, F.,
   4. Lo, S., &
   5. Akos, D.

   (2012). Detecting false signals with automatic gain control. GPS World, 23(4), 38–43. https://www.gpsworld.com/detecting-false-signals-automatic-gain-control-12804
5. ↵
   1. Dattorro, J.

   (2015). Convex optimization: Euclidean distance geometry. Meboo.
6. ↵
   1. Destino, G.,
   2. Macagnano, D., &
   3. Abreu, G.

   (2007). A clusterized WLS localization algorithm for large scale WSNs. 4th Workshop on Positioning, Navigation and Communication 2007, Hannover, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1109/wpnc.2007.353643
7. ↵
   1. Dokmanic, I.

   (2015). Listening to distances and hearing shapes: inverse problems in room acoustics and beyond [Doctoral dissertation, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne]. EPFL. https://doi.org/10.5075/EPFL-THESIS-6623
8. ↵
   1. Dokmanic, I.,
   2. Parhizkar, R.,
   3. Ranieri, J., &
   4. Vetterli, M.

   (2015). Euclidean distance matrices: essential theory, algorithms, and applications. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 32(6), 12–30. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2015.2398954
9. ↵
   1. Drineas, P.,
   2. Javed, A.,
   3. Magdon-Ismail, M.,
   4. Pandurangan, G.,
   5. Virrankoski, R., &
   6. Savvides, A.

   (2006). Distance matrix reconstruction from incomplete distance information for sensor network localization. 3rd Annual IEEE Communications Society on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, Reston, VA. https://doi.org/10.1109/SAHCN.2006.288510
10. ↵
    1. Enge, P. K.

    (1994). The Global Positioning System: signals, measurements, and performance. International Journal of Wireless Information Networks, 1(2), 83–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02106512
11. ↵
    1. Fu, G.,
    2. Khider, M., &
    3. van Diggelen, F.

    (2020). Android raw GNSS measurement datasets for precise positioning. Proc. of the 33rd International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS+ 2020), 1925–1937. https://doi.org/10.33012/2020.17628
12. ↵
    1. Holm, L., &
    2. Sander, C.

    (1993). Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. Journal of Molecular Biology, 233(1), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1993.1489

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. ↵
    1. Horn, R. A., &
    2. Johnson, C. R.

    (2013). Matrix analysis (2nd edition). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511810817
14. ↵
    1. Joerger, M.,
    2. Chan, F. -C., &
    3. Pervan, B.

    (2014). Solution separation versus residual-based RAIM. NAVIGATION, 61(4), 273–291. https://doi.org/10.1002/navi.71
15. ↵
    1. Kalman, R. E.

    (1960). A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Journal of Fluids Engineering, Transactions of the ASME, 82(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3662552
16. ↵
    1. Knight, N. L.,
    2. Wang, J., &
    3. Rizos, C.

    (2010). Generalised measures of reliability for multiple outliers. Journal of Geodesy, 84(10), 625–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-010-0392-4
17. ↵
    1. Knowles, D., &
    2. Gao, G.

    (2021a). EDM-FDE [Code repository]. https://github.com/betaBison/edm-fde
18. ↵
    1. Knowles, D., &
    2. Gao, G.

    (2021b). Euclidean distance matrix-based rapid fault detection and exclusion. Proc. of the 34th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS+ 2021), St. Louis, MO, 3382–3391. https://www.ion.org/publications/abstract.cfm?articleID=17973
19. ↵
    1. Ma, X.,
    2. Yu, K.,
    3. Montillet, J. -P., &
    4. He, X.

    (2019). Equivalence proof and performance analysis of weighted least squares residual method and weighted parity vector method in RAIM. IEEE Access, 7, 97803–97814. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2929073
20. ↵
    1. Oguz-Ekim, P.,
    2. Gomes, J. P.,
    3. Xavier, J., &
    4. Oliveira, P.

    (2011). Robust localization of nodes and time-recursive tracking in sensor networks using noisy range measurements. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 59(8), 3930–3942. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2011.2153848
21. ↵
    1. Parkinson, B. W., &
    2. Axelrad, P.

    (1988). Autonomous GPS integrity monitoring using the pseudorange residual. NAVIGATION, 35(2), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.1002/J.2161-4296.1988.TB00955.X
22. ↵
    1. Pullen, S., &
    2. Joerger, M.

    (2021). GNSS integrity. In Y. J. Morton, F. van Diggelen, J. J. Spilker Jr.., B. W. Parkinson, S. Lo, & G. X. Gao (Eds.), Position, navigation, and timing technologies in the 21st century: integrated satellite navigation, sensor systems, and civil applications, Vol. 2 (pp. 591–617). Wiley. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Position,+Navigation,+and+Timing+Technologies+in+the+21st+Century:+Integrated+Satellite+Navigation,+Sensor+Systems,+and+Civil+Applications,+Volume+2-p-9781119458494
23. ↵
    1. Reisdorf, P.,
    2. Pfeifer, T.,
    3. Breßler, J.,
    4. Bauer, S.,
    5. Weissig, P.,
    6. Lange, S.,
    7. Wanielik, G., &
    8. Protzel, P.

    (2016). The problem of comparable GNSS results––an approach for a uniform dataset with low-cost and reference data. 5th International Conference on Advances in Vehicular Systems, Technologies and Applications (VEHICULAR). https://www.tu-chemnitz.de/projekt/smartLoc/paper/reisdorf2016.pdf
24. ↵
    1. Tenenbaum, J. B.,
    2. De Silva, V., &
    3. Langford, J. C.

    (2000). A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Science, 290(5500), 2319–2323. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.290.5500.2319

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. ↵
    1. Wang, L.,
    2. Groves, P. D., &
    3. Ziebart, M. K.

    (2015). Smartphone shadow matching for better cross-street GNSS positioning in urban environments. Journal of Navigation, 68(3), 411–433. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463314000836
26. ↵
    1. Wu, Z.,
    2. Yao, Z., &
    3. Lu, M.

    (2019). Coordinate establishment of ground-based positioning systems with anchor information. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 68(3), 2517–2525. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2019.2893456
27. ↵
    1. Yang, L.,
    2. Wang, J.,
    3. Knight, N. L., &
    4. Shen, Y.

    (2013). Outlier separability analysis with a multiple alternative hypotheses test. Journal of Geodesy, 87(6), 591–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-013-0629-0
28. ↵
    1. Zhu, N.,
    2. Marais, J.,
    3. Bétaille, D., &
    4. Berbineau, M.

    (2018). GNSS position integrity in urban environments: a review of literature. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 19(9), 2762–2778. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2017.2766768